Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School

By Jeremy M. Wolfe, Todd S. Horowitz, Michael J. Van Wert, Naomi M. Kenner, Skyler S. Place and Nour Kibbi

Abstract

In visual search tasks, observers look for targets in displays containing distractors. Likelihood that targets will be missed varies with target prevalence, the frequency with which targets are presented across trials. Miss error rates are much higher at low target prevalence (1%–2%) than at high prevalence (50%). Unfortunately, low prevalence is characteristic of important search tasks such as airport security and medical screening where miss errors are dangerous. A series of experiments show this prevalence effect is very robust. In signal detection terms, the prevalence effect can be explained as a criterion shift and not a change in sensitivity. Several efforts to induce observers to adopt a better criterion fail. However, a regime of brief retraining periods with high prevalence and full feedback allows observers to hold a good criterion during periods of low prevalence with no feedback

Topics: attention, visual search, airport security, low prevalence
Year: 2013
OAI identifier: oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.321.2441
Provided by: CiteSeerX
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/v... (external link)
  • http://search.bwh.harvard.edu/... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.