Location of Repository

Learning about Learning in Games through Experimental Control of Strategic Interdependence

By Jason Shachat A and J. Todd Swarthout B


We report experiments in which humans repeatedly play one of two games against a computer program that follows either a reinforcement learning or an Experience Weighted Attraction algorithm. Our experiments show these learning algorithms detect exploitable opportunities more sensitively than humans. Also, learning algorithms respond to detected payoff-increasing opportunities systematically; however, the responses are too weak to improve the algorithms ’ payoffs. Human play against various decision maker types doesn’t vary significantly. These factors lead to a strong linear relationship between the humans ’ and algorithms ’ action choice proportions that is suggestive of the algorithm’s best response correspondence. These properties are revealed only by our human versus computer experiments, and not by our standard human versus human experiments, nor our model simulations. JEL classification: C72; C92; C8

Topics: Learning, Repeated games, Experiments, Simulation
Year: 2013
OAI identifier: oai:CiteSeerX.psu:
Provided by: CiteSeerX
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/v... (external link)
  • http://excen.gsu.edu/workingpa... (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.