Location of Repository

Authors ’ affiliations:

By David J. Acunzo, Graham Mackenzie, Mark C. W. Van Rossum, Corresponding David, J. Acunzo, David J. Acunzo and Mark Van Rossum

Abstract

The event-related potential (ERP) and event-related field (ERF) techniques provide valuable insights into the time course of processes in the brain. Because neural signals are typically weak, researchers commonly filter the data to increase the signal-to-noise ratio. However, filtering may distort the data, leading to false results. Using our own EEG data, we show that acausal high-pass filtering can generate a systematic bias easily leading to misinterpretations of neural activity. In particular, we show that the early ERP component C1 is very sensitive to such effects. Moreover, we found that about half of the papers reporting modulations in the C1 range used a high-pass digital filter cut-off above the recommended maximum of 0.1 Hz. More generally, among 185 relevant ERP/ERF publications, 80 used cutoffs above 0.1 Hz. As a consequence, part of the ERP/ERF literature may need to be reanalyzed. We provide guidelines on how to minimize filtering artifacts

Topics: ERF, high-pass filtering, data processing, C1 Highlights
Year: 2013
OAI identifier: oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.307.9771
Provided by: CiteSeerX
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/v... (external link)
  • http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.