This edition of Corpora contains one of the first ever collections of papers
pertaining to the nascent discipline of Modern Diachronic Corpus-Assisted
Discourse Studies (MD-CADS). This discipline is characterised by the
novelty both of its methodology and the topics it is, consequently, in a
position to treat. It employs relatively large corpora of a parallel structure
and content from different moments of contemporary time (in this case the
SiBol corpora, see below) in order to track changes inmodern language usage
but also social, cultural and political changes as reflected in language.
In this overview, I will attempt to give an idea of what both corpusassisted
discourse studies (CADS) and MD-CADS involve, to provide
some information about the newspaper corpora we employ, and to outline
methodologies commonly followed in this area, including those employed
by the other contributors to this issue. I will also present two sets of practical
analyses. The first is inductive and bottom-up, derived from a close analysis
of the comparative keywords generated by comparing the lists of items from
the two parallel corpora from different time periods; the aim is to uncover
changes over time both in language and in what social, political and cultural
issues were considered worthy of attention. The second is more intuitive and
hypothesis-driven; the hypothesis is that an examination of a certain term,
namely moral panic, can shed some light on which issues writers thought
did not merit all the attention they were receiving. I will conclude with brief
sketches of the other papers in this issue, and reflections on the relevance of
MD-CADS in both language research and teaching
Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.