Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Send correspondence to:

By  and Denny BorsboomJan-willem Romeijn, Jelte M. Wicherts and Denny Borsboom

Abstract

This paper shows that measurement invariance (defined in terms of an invariant measurement model in different groups) is generally inconsistent with selection invariance (defined in terms of equal sensitivity and specificity across groups). In particular, when a unidimensional measurement instrument is used, and group differences are present in the location but not in the variance of the latent distribution, sensitivity and positive predictive value will be higher in the group located at the higher end of the latent dimension, whereas specificity and negative predictive value will be higher in the group located at the lower end of the latent dimension. When latent variances are unequal, the differences in these quantities depend on the size of group differences in variances, relative to the size of group differences in means. The effect is shown to originate as a special case of Simpson’s paradox, which arises because the observed score distribution is collapsed into an accept/reject dichotomy. Simulations show that the effect can be substantia

Year: 2013
OAI identifier: oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.297.974
Provided by: CiteSeerX
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/v... (external link)
  • http://www.kent.ac.uk/secl/phi... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.