Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Where are we now in the debate about the first great debate?

By Peter Wilson
Topics: JZ International relations
Publisher: Routledge
Year: 2012
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:41819
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. 2 Osiander’s assertion that Carr’s style of argument ‘is no more rigorous than that of those whom he criticised’ (Osiander 1998: 429) seems to me wide of the mark.
  2. (1989). 3 Thies fails to identify, however, the domestic analogy that informs so much of their work, perhaps unaware of Suganami’s important
  3. (2004). 4 A mistake fallen into by even as meticulous a scholar as Sylvest. While noting that the ‘distinction between academia and politics … is hard to discern in interwar debates on international politics’,
  4. (1996). 75 Years On: Rewriting the Subject’s Past—Reinventing its Future’, doi
  5. (2000). A Critical Appraisal,
  6. (1998). Although the flaws in Carr’s analysis in The Twenty Years’ Crisis and elsewhere are 39 now well known (see e.g.
  7. (2009). British Liberal Internationalism, 1880-1930: Making Progress?, doi
  8. (2000). Carr and his Early Critics: Responses to The Twenty Years’
  9. (1998). Carr and International Relations: A Duty to Lie, Cambridge: doi
  10. (2002). Carr and the Spirit Ironic: doi
  11. (1995). Conclusion: Inter-War Idealism, Liberal Internationalism, and Contemporary International Theory’, in David Long and Peter Wilson (eds) Thinkers of the Twenty Years’ Crisis: Inter-War Idealism Reassessed, doi
  12. (1999). Creating International Studies: Angell, Mitrany and the Liberal Tradition, doi
  13. (1995). David Davies and the Enforcement of Peace’, in David Long and Peter Wilson (eds), Thinkers of the Twenty Years’ Crisis: Inter-War Idealism Reassessed, doi
  14. (2002). Did the Realist-Idealist Great Debate Ever Happen? A Revisionist History of International Relations’, doi
  15. (2011). Gilbert Murray and International Relations: Liberalism, Hellenism, and International Intellectual Cooperation as a Path to Peace’, doi
  16. (1988). History and Discipline in doi
  17. (1991). Hobson and Idealism in International Relations’, doi
  18. (2001). International Relations: The Dawn of a Historiographical Turn?’, doi
  19. (2004). Interwar Internationalism, the British Labour Party, and the doi
  20. (1995). Introduction: The Twenty Years’ Crisis and the Category of ‘Idealism’ in International Relations’, in David Long and Peter Wilson (eds) Thinkers of the Twenty Years’ Crisis: Inter-War Idealism Reassessed, doi
  21. (1998). Lessons from the Past: Reassessing the Interwar Disciplinary doi
  22. (2009). Living the Great Illusion: Sir Norman Angell, 1872-1967, doi
  23. (1995). Lord Lothian and the Federalist Critique of National Sovereignty’, in David Long and Peter Wilson (eds) Thinkers of the Twenty Years’ Crisis: Inter-War Idealism Reassessed,
  24. (2010). Past Masters and Modern Inventions: Intellectual History as Critical Theory’, doi
  25. (1995). Philip Noel-Baker and Peace Through Law’, in David Long and Peter Wilson (eds)
  26. (2003). Political Theory and the Functions of Intellectual History: A Response to Emmanuel Navon’, doi
  27. (2002). Progress, History and Identity in International Relations Theory: The Case of the Idealist-Realist Debate’, doi
  28. (2001). Radicalism for a Conservative Purpose: The Peculiar Realism of doi
  29. (2008). Realism and the Left: The Case of Hans doi
  30. (2008). Reclaiming the Critical Dimension of Realism: Hans J. Morgenthau on the Ethics of Scholarship’, doi
  31. (1997). Reconstructing Realism: Between Power Politics and Cosmopolitan Ethics,
  32. (1998). Rereading Early Twentieth-Century IR Theory: Idealism Revisited’, doi
  33. (2007). Retreiving Cosmos: Gilbert Murray’s Thought on International Relations’, doi
  34. (1991). Security in Anarchy: Utopian Realism in Theory and Practice’, doi
  35. (2001). The “Third Debate” Revisited’, doi
  36. (2005). The Construction of an Edifice: The Story of a First Great Debate’, doi
  37. (1989). The Domestic Analogy and World Order Proposals, Cambridge: doi
  38. (1996). The Growing Relevance of Pluralism?’ doi
  39. (2006). The Hidden History of Realism: A Genealogy of Power Politics, doi
  40. (2003). The International Theory of Leonard Woolf: A Study doi
  41. (1998). The Myth of the First Great Debate’ doi
  42. (1996). The New Europe Debate in Wartime Britain’,
  43. (1998). The Political Discourse of Anarchy: A Disciplinary History of International Relations, doi
  44. (1983). The Power of Power Politics: A Critique London: doi
  45. (1969). The Theory of International Politics, 1919-1969’, doi
  46. (1939). The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919-1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations, doi
  47. (1999). The Vices of Integrity: doi
  48. (1965). The Whig Interpretation of History, doi
  49. (2006). Where are the Idealists in doi
  50. (2006). Who Killed the International Studies Conference?’ doi
  51. (2009). Writing the World: Disciplinary History and Beyond’, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.