Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The last shall be first: political dimensions of conditional cash transfers in Brazil

By Anthony Hall


Early evidence suggests that Brazil's Bolsa Família (Family Stipend) program, which currently benefits over 12 million poor families, has alleviated absolute poverty. Although hailed by many as an unqualified success, its political dimensions have been largely ignored or underplayed. These include, for example, the unashamed use of Bolsa Família for electoral purposes, the spread of clientelism and patronage, and the growing dependence of Brazil's poor on income transfers rather than productive employment. Furthermore, there are indications that the popularity of Bolsa Família is encouraging short-termism in social policy. Many Brazilian policy makers now seem to view the program as mainstream social policy rather than as a temporary measure-a perspective that could undermine longer-term investments in key areas such as health and basic education

Topics: HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform, JC Political theory
Publisher: Taylor & Francis Group
Year: 2012
DOI identifier: 10.1080/15588742.2012.624065
OAI identifier:
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles


  1. (2006). Brazil: Major lessons from Fome Zero (Zero Hunger). Santiago: FAO Regional Office.
  2. (2006). Cash transfers: Panacea for poverty reduction or money down the drain?’ doi
  3. (2011). Cash transfers. Evidence paper, London: DFID, Policy Division.
  4. (2011). Conditional cash transfers as a tool of social policy.’
  5. (2006). Examining conditional cash transfer programmes: A role for increased social inclusion?’
  6. (2008). Lula of Brazil: The story so far. doi
  7. (2011). Models of clientelism and policy change: The case of conditional cash transfer programmes in Mexico and Brazil.’ doi
  8. (1996). Opportunity foregone: Education in Brazil. Washington DC: doi
  9. (2011). Social policy and vote in Brazil: Bolsa Família and the sifts in Lula’s eectoral bse.’ doi
  10. (2008). Social protection for the poor and the poorest. Basingstoke and doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.