Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Research governance and ethics for adult social care research: procedures, practices and challenges

By John Woolham

Abstract

The introduction of the Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care by the Department of Health in 2001 extended the reach of research governance from the NHS, where reviewing arrangements were already well established, into universities and local authorities, who were requested in the guidance to introduce arrangements to ensure appropriate levels of ethical and methodological review. This paper describes the different structures and processes used by the NHS, universities and local authorities to meet the expectations of the Department of Health, and offers a critical analysis of some of the consequences – both problems and opportunities – that have resulted

Topics: HA Statistics, HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology
Publisher: NIHR School for Social Care Research
Year: 2011
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:41195
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2003). A
  2. (2007). A 55kg paper mountain: the impact of new research governance and ethics processes on mental health services research in England, doi
  3. (2002). A code of ethics for social work and social care research, doi
  4. (2011). A New Pathway for the Regulation and Governance of Health Research, The Academy of Medical Sciences, doi
  5. (2008). An analysis of decision letters by research ethics committees: the ethics/scientific quality boundary examined, Quality and Safety in Health Care, doi
  6. (2002). British Association of Social Workers doi
  7. (2000). Editorial: Multi-Centre Research Ethics Committees: has the cure been worse than the disease? doi
  8. (2002). Editorial: research governance: for whose benefit?,
  9. (2002). Editorial: The promise of research governance: building research and development capacity and clinical research in primary health care, doi
  10. (2009). Ethical Decision-Making in Social Research: A Practical Guide, doi
  11. (2010). for Social Care Research Methods Review Research governance and ethics for adult social care research 31Boddy J, Oliver C
  12. (2006). for Social Care Research Methods Review Research governance and ethics for adult social care research 32Dingwall R
  13. (2009). for Social Care Research Methods Review Research governance and ethics for adult social care research 33McLaughlin H, Shardlow SM
  14. (2004). for Social Care Research Methods Review Research governance and ethics for adult social care research 34Tinker A, Coomber V
  15. (2003). Gaining ethical approval for research into sensitive topics: ‘two strikes and you’re out?’, doi
  16. (2011). Governance Arrangements for Research Ethics Committees: A Harmonised Edition, Department of Health. Available at http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/ Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_126474.
  17. Health (2001a) The Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care, Department of Health, doi
  18. Health (2005a) The Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care, Department of Health, doi
  19. (2007). Is ‘inconsistency’ in research ethics committee decision-making really a problem? An empirical investigation and reflection, doi
  20. (2001). Judging the ethics of qualitative research: considering the ‘ethics as process’ model, doi
  21. (1991). Local Research Ethics Committees, Department of Health,
  22. (2003). Principlism or narrative ethics: must we choose between them?, doi
  23. (2011). Problem or safeguard? Research ethics review in social care research and the Mental Capacity Act doi
  24. (2007). Proportional ethical review and the identification of ethical issues, doi
  25. (2002). Research and development in social care: governance and good practice,
  26. (2011). Research Ethics Committee doi
  27. (2011). Research Ethics Review: Social Care and Social Science Research and the Mental Capacity Act 2005, Ethics and Social Welfare http://www.tandfonline.com/action/showAxaArticles?journalCode=resw20 pre-publication copy accessed 14.09.11. doi
  28. (2007). Research Governance in Midlands Councils with Social Services Responsibilities: results of a survey of member authorities to assess skills and capacity, Unpublished, Northamptonshire County Council.
  29. (2002). Research Governance in Social Care: doi
  30. (2006). Research Governance in Social Care: The Findings of the 2005 Baseline Assessment Exercise, Department of Health,
  31. (2008). Research governance, ethics and access: a case study illustrating the new challenges facing social researchers, doi
  32. (2010). Reviewing and Reading Social Care Research: From Ideas to Findings.
  33. (2005). Scaling back the paper mountain,
  34. (2009). Securing Ethics Approval: The Route Map for Social Care Researchers. Available at http://www.screc.org.uk/files/routemap.pdf (accessed 15
  35. (2007). Should research ethics committees be told how to think? doi
  36. (2010). Social Research Council doi
  37. Social Services Research Group et al (2010) Research Governance Framework Resource Pack for Social Care, Social Services Research Group,
  38. (2007). The Department of Health’s Research Governance Framework remains an impediment to multi-centre studies: findings from a national descriptive study, doi
  39. (2008). The ESRC research ethics framework and research ethics review in UK universities: rebuilding the Tower of Babel REC by REC, doi
  40. (2007). The ethics of policy research, doi
  41. (2007). The impact of research governance in the United Kingdom on research involving a national survey, doi
  42. (2005). The Mental Capacity Act doi
  43. (2004). The other face of research governance, doi
  44. (2004). The Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care Implementation Plan for Social Care, Department of Health, doi
  45. (2001). The Royal Liverpool Hospital Childrens’ Inquiry Report (The Redfern Report)
  46. (2003). The Victoria Climbié Inquiry Report Sixth Report of Session 2002–03 Report, and formal minutes together with oral Evidence,
  47. (2006). The views and experiences of Councils with Social Services Responsibilities of the Department for Education and Skills 2004–05 user experience survey of children in need, A survey commissioned by the Association of Directors of Social Services (ADASS),
  48. (2003). Warman A
  49. (2006). What counts as research? The implications for research governance in social care, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.