Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Divergences of perspective between people with aphasia and their family caregivers

By Alex Gillespie, Joan Murphy and Morag Place


Background: Studies of the relation between family caregivers and care-receivers have identified large divergences between their perspectives. It has been suggested that these divergences may adversely affect the care relationship. However, there has been little research examining the source of these divergences. Aims: The reported mixed-method study aimed to examine the relationship between people with aphasia and their family caregivers in order to identify the sources of observed divergences of perspective. Methods & Procedures: A total of 20 people with aphasia and their main family caregivers, living in the UK, completed an adapted version of the Interpersonal Perception Method questionnaire, which yielded both rating data and qualitative data. Participants rated themselves, each other, and how they thought the other would rate them, on issues regarding communication ability and identity. Outcomes & Results: As expected on the basis of existing research, divergences clustered around the provision of communication support and issues of confidence, independence, embarrassment, and overprotection. A qualitative analysis of the participants' talk during the rating task suggested that a source of these discrepancies is in the conflicting demands which characterise the care relationship, specifically, caregivers' desire to support independence on the one hand but feeling compelled to be protective on the other hand. In response to these demands, caregivers try to create the impression that the disability has less impact than it has, and that they are more in control than they feel they are. Conclusions: We conclude by suggesting that some divergences of perspective may not be adverse overall, but rather may be a result of caregivers' creative adaptations to seemingly irreconcilable demands

Topics: BF Psychology, H Social Sciences (General)
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Year: 2010
DOI identifier: 10.1080/02687038.2010.500810
OAI identifier:
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles


  1. (1995). A description of the consequences of aphasia on aphasic persons and their relatives and friends, based on the WHO model of chronic diseases. doi
  2. (2007). Access and social inclusion in aphasia: Interactional principles and applications. doi
  3. (2000). Assessing needs from patient, carer and professional perspectives: The Camberwell Assessment of Need for Elderly people in primary care. doi
  4. (2007). Balancing rights and risks: Conflicting perspectives in the management of wandering in dementia. doi
  5. (2002). Caregivers of stroke patient family members: Behavioral and attitudinal indicators of overprotective care. doi
  6. (1998). Caregiving from the recipient's perspective: Negative reactions to being helped, doi
  7. (2005). Carer distress: A prospective, population-based study. doi
  8. (2008). Caring for independent lives: Geographies of caring for young adults with intellectual disabilities. doi
  9. (1995). Co-constructing meaning in conversations with an aphasic man. doi
  10. (2005). Communication and understanding in parent-adolescent relationships. doi
  11. (2002). Companions through cancer: The care given by informal carers in cancer contexts. doi
  12. (2004). Congruence between disabled elders and their primary caregivers. doi
  13. (2000). Enabling people with aphasia to discuss quality of life. doi
  14. (2002). Estimating paid and unpaid hours of personal assistance services in activities of daily living provided to adults living at home. doi
  15. (2006). Finding messages in bottles: Living successfully with stroke and aphasia. doi
  16. Getting through' not 'going under': A qualitative study of gender and spousal support after diagnosis with colorectal cancer. doi
  17. (1997). Grounded theory in practice. doi
  18. (1999). Group training in communication skills for carers of adults with aphasia. doi
  19. (1966). Interpersonal perception: A theory and method of research. doi
  20. (2010). Intersubjectivity: Towards a dialogical analysis. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, (early view accessed 12/12/2009, doi
  21. (2007). Interviewing people with aphasia: Insights into method adjustments from a pilot study. doi
  22. (2000). Invisible support and adjustment to stress. doi
  23. (2005). Measuring quality of life: Comparing family members’ and friends’ ratings with those of their aphasic partners. doi
  24. (1993). Not worth the risk? Attitudes of adults with learning difficulties, and their informal and formal carers to the hazards of everyday life. doi
  25. (2006). Overprotection,“speaking for”, and conversational participation: A study of couples with aphasia. doi
  26. (2006). Perceptions of communication between people with communication disability and general practice staff. doi
  27. (1890). Principles of psychology. doi
  28. (2004). Renegotiation of identity: The social context of aphasia support groups. doi
  29. (2002). Seeking': A key activity for new family carers of stroke survivors. doi
  30. (2004). Speaking for another: The management of participant frames in aphasia. doi
  31. (2004). Speaking for' behaviours in spouses of people with aphasia: A descriptive study of six couples in an interview situation. doi
  32. (1991). Spouse attitudes toward the person with aphasia. doi
  33. (2001). Spouses' perceptions of persons with aphasia. doi
  34. (1997). Taking about aphasia. Maidenhead:
  35. (1932). The Philosophy of the Present. La Salle,
  36. (2005). Whose informational needs are considered? A comparison between cancer patients and their spouses' perceptions of their own and their partners' knowledge and informational needs. doi
  37. (2001). World Health Organisation doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.