Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Corporate strategy and national institutions: the case of the man-made fibres industry

By Geoffrey Owen


This article discusses the impact of national policies and institutions on the strategies that companies adopt when they are faced with disruptive changes in their external environment. The article focuses on the man-made fibres industry in the U.S., Western Europe and Japan between 1980 and 2010 and describes the different ways in which the leading fibre manufacturers in those regions responded to the shift in textile, clothing and later fibre production to low-cost countries, principally in Asia. These companies had to decide whether they could continue to compete profitably in the man-made fibres industry, and, if not, what non-fibre businesses they should invest in. In countries such as the U.S. and the UK, where capital markets are powerful and companies are under pressure to enhance shareholder value, virtually all the former leaders have withdrawn from the industry and a set of new entrants, including private equity firms, have taken their place. In Japan, by contrast, leading companies such as Toray and Teijin remain committed to man-made fibres, although they have also diversified in other directions. Despite the increasing role of Anglo-American investors in Japan, Japanese companies see themselves as responsible to a broad range of stakeholders, not just to shareholders; the continuity of the enterprise and of employment is given a higher priority than in the U.S. or the UK. In Continental Europe, the restructuring of the man-made fibres industry has involved numerous divestments and demergers, and this partly reflects the growing influence of Anglo-American investors, but in some of these countries the stakeholder view of the enterprise continues to carry considerable weight. Lenzing in Austria, which is now the largest European man-made fibre manufacturer, is an example of a company which has combined commercial success with a strong sense of responsibility to the region where its main factory is based. In reviewing these different strategies the article shows how Japanese-style “long-termism” can be a source of strength in certain industries such as carbon fibre, but has the disadvantage of allowing companies to persist for too long with low-return businesses which might do a better under different owners. Some further movement towards the Anglo-American model is likely in Japan and in Continental Europe, but these countries have a different view of what companies are for, and this will continue to affect how their companies respond to industrial change

Topics: HD Industries. Land use. Labor
Publisher: Berkeley Electronic Press
Year: 2011
DOI identifier: 10.2202/1932-0213.1080
OAI identifier:
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles


  1. (1996). A
  2. (2007). A (2010), Meaning structures in a contested issue field: a topographic map of shareholder value in Austria, doi
  3. (2005). A clash of capitalisms: foreign shareholders and corporate restructuring in 1990s Japan, doi
  4. (2000). A transformation of the French model of shareholding and management, doi
  5. (1989). Banks and corporate control in doi
  6. (2002). Big and small business in Italy’s industrial history,
  7. (1993). Capitalism against capitalism, English language edition,
  8. (2002). Changing fortunes, remaking the industrial corporation,
  9. (2008). Choose and focus, Japanese business strategies for the st century, doi
  10. (2001). Corporate governance and merger activity in the US: making sense of the 1980s and 1990s, doi
  11. (1993). Corporate restructuring in the chemicals industry, in Margaret M Blair (ed) The deal decade,
  12. (1998). Corporate restructuring in the United Kingdom and West Germany: recent developments in large non-financial companies, Unpublished PhD thesis,
  13. (2011). Corporate Strategy and National Institutions Published by Berkeley Electronic Press,
  14. (2002). Debating the restructuring of French capitalism and AngloSaxon institutional investors: Trojan horses or sleeping partners? doi
  15. (2011). Divergent capitalisms, the social structuring and change of business systems, doi
  16. (2001). Everyone wins! A life in free enterprise,
  17. (1998). Evolution of industry structure in the chemical industry, in Ashish Arora, Ralph Landau and Nathan Rosenberg (eds), Chemicals and long-term economic growth,
  18. (1997). German capitalism: does it exist? Can it survive? In Colin Crouch and Wolfgang Streeck (eds), Political economy of modern capitalism: mapping convergence and diversity, Sage Toray Industries doi
  19. (2005). History of corporate governance in Italy, in Randall K Morck (ed), Corporate governance around the world: family business groups to professional managers, doi
  20. (2002). Industrial exploitation of carbon fibre in the UK, doi
  21. (1998). Italian capitalism between the private and public sectors, 1933-1994,
  22. (1991). Japanese takeovers, the global contest for corporate control, doi
  23. (2002). Large firms and institutional change, industrial renewal and economic restructuring in France, doi
  24. (1985). Les grandes manoeuvres industrielles Belford. doi
  25. (1968). Man-made cellulosic fibres, doi
  26. (2005). Political power and corporate control, the new global politics of corporate governance, doi
  27. (1973). Political responsibility and industry,
  28. (1991). Political turbulence, enterprise crisis and industrial recovery: ICI and Montedison,
  29. (1993). Polyester, fifty years of achievement, Textile Institute,
  30. (1974). Private enterprise and public intervention: the Courtaulds experience, George Allen and Unwin.
  31. (2011). Restructuring of the man-made fibres industry in doi
  32. (2002). Shareholder value, management culture and production regimes in the transformation of the German chemical-pharmaceutical industry, WZB Discussion paper, doi
  33. (2000). Stock market capitalism: welfare capitalism, Japan and Germany versus the Anglo-Saxons, doi
  34. (2001). Susanne Kalss, Alex Stomper and Josef Zechner doi
  35. (2000). The “economic miracle” and Italy’s chemical industry: 1950-1965: a missed opportunity, doi
  36. (2008). The beginnings of Nazi autarky policy: the “National Pulp Programme” and the origin of regional staple fibre plants, doi
  37. (1998). The evolution of corporate capabilities and corporate structure within the world’s largest chemical firms: the twentieth century perspective, in Arora et al (eds), Chemicals and long-term economic growth,
  38. (2005). The history of corporate ownership and control in Germany, in Randall K Morck (ed), Corporate governance around the world: family business groups to professional managers, doi
  39. (1998). The Japanese puzzle: rapid catch-up and long struggle, in Arora et al, (eds), Chemicals and long-term economic growth,
  40. (1998). The new financial capitalists, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts and the creation of corporate value, doi
  41. (2010). The return of the state? French economic policy of Nicolas Sarkozy, Paper presented to the 106 th Meeting of the American Political Science Association,
  42. (2010). The rise and fall of great companies: Courtaulds and the reshaping of the man-made fibres industry, Pasold Research Fund/Oxford. doi
  43. (2001). The transformation of Hoechst into Aventis, WZB and Henley Management College.
  44. (2001). Varieties of capitalism, doi
  45. (1995). Why ICI decided to demerge,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.