Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

How are we creative together?: comparing sociocognitive and sociocultural answers

By Vlad Petre Glăveanu

Abstract

The present article aims to distinguish between a sociocognitive and a sociocultural approach to forms of “collective” creativity. While the first is well-illustrated by studies of group or team creativity, the second has generally supported investigations of collaborative creativity, most of them performed in the last few decades. The comparison between these two fields takes different levels into account, from the epistemological position adopted to issues concerning the theories and methods used. Special attention is given to reviewing models of creativity. However, although the literature on group creativity contains several cognitive models, there is a scarcity of such constructions for collaborative creativity. This is why a secondary aim of this material is to introduce a sociocultural theoretical framework and discuss its implications for developing situated models of creativity. In the end, the similarities and differences between the two paradigms are examined with reference to both theory and research and arguments are given for why it would be beneficial for sociocognitivists and socioculturalists to engage in a more consistent dialogue

Topics: BF Psychology
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Year: 2011
DOI identifier: 10.1177/0959354310372152
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:38611
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge: doi
  2. (1999). All creation is a collaboration. In
  3. (1957). Applied imagination. doi
  4. (2003). Better than individuals? The potential benefits of dissent and diversity for group creativity. doi
  5. (2005). Beyond binary choices: Integrating individual and social creativity. doi
  6. (2002). Cognitive stimulation and interference in groups: Exposure effects in an idea generation task. doi
  7. (2003). Cognitive stimulation and interference in ideagenerating groups. doi
  8. (2004). Collaborative creativity: Contemporary perspectives. doi
  9. (2004). Creative collaboration in organisational settings.
  10. (2000). Creative collaboration. doi
  11. (2004). Creativity and the Net: How do researchers collaborate creatively using the Internet? In
  12. (2004). Creativity in communication: A theoretical framework for collaborative product creation. doi
  13. (1996). Creativity in context. Colorado:
  14. (1990). Cultural psychology – What is it? In doi
  15. (1996). Cultural psychology: a once and future discipline. doi
  16. (1995). Deconstructing the lone genius myth: Toward a contextual view of creativity. doi
  17. (2003). Dialogicality and social representations: The dynamics of mind. Cambridge:
  18. (2003). Diversity and creativity in work groups: A dynamic perspective on the affective and cognitive processes that link diversity and performance. doi
  19. (1958). Does group participation when using brainstorming facilitate or inhibit creative thinking? doi
  20. (1991). Effects of ethnic group cultural differences on cooperative and competitive behavior on a group task. doi
  21. (2004). Empathic creativity: The product of empathic attunement.
  22. (2006). Empirical studies of creative cognition in idea generation.
  23. (2003). Enhancing ideational creativity in groups: Lessons from research on brainstorming. doi
  24. (2006). Four principles of group creativity.
  25. (2006). Group brainstorming and teamwork: Some rules for the road to innovation.
  26. (2003). Group creativity: An introduction. doi
  27. (2003). Group creativity: Common themes and future directions. doi
  28. (2007). Group genius. doi
  29. (1999). Group preference and convergent tendencies in small groups: A content analysis of group brainstorming performance. doi
  30. (2000). Groups, teams, and creativity: the creative potential of idea-generating groups. doi
  31. (1869). Hereditary genius: An inquiry into its laws and consequences. doi
  32. (2004). How collaboration in creative work impacts identity and motivation.
  33. (2006). How the group affects the mind: A cognitive model of idea generation in groups. doi
  34. (2003). Innovation implementation in work teams. doi
  35. (2008). Introduction to the special issue: ‘Collaborative creativity: Socio-cultural perspectives’. Thinking Skills and Creativity, doi
  36. (2003). Is the social psychology of creativity really social? Moving beyond a focus on the individual. doi
  37. (2007). Knowledge in context: Representations, community and culture. doi
  38. (2004). Making the team: A guide for managers (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River:
  39. (2007). Management and creativity: from creative industries to creative management. doi
  40. (2003). Managing the risk of learning: Psychological safety in work teams. In doi
  41. (2008). Methods for studying collaborative creativity: An original and adventurous blend. Thinking Skills and Creativity, doi
  42. (2009). Paradigms in the study of creativity: Introducing the perspective of cultural psychology. New Ideas in Psychology, doi
  43. (1971). Playing and reality. doi
  44. (1993). Shared mental models in expert team decision making.
  45. (1999). Social creativity: introduction.
  46. (1997). Social creativity: the challenge of complexity. Translation of Le dimensioni sociali della creatività.
  47. (2006). Team mental models and team performance: A field study of the effects of team mental model similarity and accuracy. doi
  48. (2004). The ‘romance of teams’: Towards an understanding of its psychological underpinnings and implications. doi
  49. (1896). The crowd: a study of the popular mind. doi
  50. (2008). The discourse of collaborative creative writing: Peer collaboration as a context for mutual inspiration. Thinking Skills and Creativity, doi
  51. (2002). The impact of cross-training on team effectiveness. doi
  52. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team processes and performance. doi
  53. (2003). The liberating role of conflict in group creativity: A cross cultural study. Institute for Research on Labor and Employment Working Paper Series. Retrieved October 9, 2007, from http://repositories.cdlib.org. doi
  54. (2008). The situated aspect of creativity in communicative events: How do children design web pages together? Thinking Skills and Creativity, doi
  55. (2004). The social consequences of classroom art: Collaboration, social identities and social representations.
  56. (2003). The use of symbolic resources in developmental transitions. doi
  57. (2007). Toward more creative and innovative group idea generation: A cognitive-social-motivational perspective of brainstorming. doi
  58. (1972). Victims of groupthink: A psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascos. doi
  59. (2005). What differences make a difference? The promise and reality of diverse teams in organizations. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.