Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The impact of questioning method on measurement error in panel survey measures of benefit receipt: evidence from a validation study

By Peter Lynn, Annette Jäckle, Stephen P. Jenkins and Emanuela Sala

Abstract

We assess measurement error in panel survey reports of social security benefit receipt, drawing on a unique validation study. Our aims are threefold. First, we quantify the incidence of measurement errors (under- and over-reporting). Second, we assess the extent to which this varies according to the questioning method that is used. Specifically, dependent interviewing has been proposed as a way to reduce under-reporting in some circumstances. We compare two versions of dependent interviewing with traditional independent interviewing in an experimental design. Third, we identify and assess new ways of reducing measurement error in panel surveys. We use data from a large-scale UK household panel survey and we consider six benefits. To assess the measurement error, a validation exercise was conducted, with administrative data on benefit receipt matched at the individual level to the survey microdata

Topics: HA Statistics, HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology
Publisher: Wiley on behalf of the Royal Statistical Society
Year: 2012
DOI identifier: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2011.00717.x
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:38080
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles


To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.