Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Normalizing economic loss from natural disasters: a global analysis

By Fabian Barthel and Eric Neumayer


Climate change is likely to lead to an increase in the frequency and/or intensity of certain types of natural hazards, if not globally, then at least in certain regions. All other things equal, this should lead to an increase in the economic toll from natural disasters over time. Yet, all other things are not equal since affected areas become wealthier over time and rational individuals and governments undertake defensive mitigation measures, which requires normalizing economic losses if one wishes to analyze trends in economic loss from natural disasters for detecting a potential climate change signal. In this article, we argue that the conventional methodology for normalizing economic loss is problematic since it normalizes for changes in wealth over time, but fails to normalize for differences in wealth across space at any given point of time. We introduce an alternative methodology that overcomes this problem in theory, but faces many more problems in its empirical application. Applying, therefore, both methods to the most comprehensive existing global dataset of natural disaster loss, in general we find no significant upward trends in normalized disaster damage over the period 1980 to 2009 globally, regionally, for specific disasters or for specific disasters in specific regions. Due to our inability to control for defensive mitigation measures, one cannot infer from our analysis that there have definitely not been more frequent and/or more intensive weather-related natural hazards over the study period already. Moreover, it may still be far too early to detect a trend if humaninduced climate change has only just started and will gain momentum over time

Topics: GE Environmental Sciences, HC Economic History and Conditions
Publisher: Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy and Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment
Year: 2010
OAI identifier:
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles


  1. (2008). An exploration of trends in normalized weather-related catastrophe losses, in: doi
  2. (2001). Climate Change doi
  3. (2008). Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability, New York: Cambridge University Press. 30 Institute for Business and Home Safety,
  4. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis,
  5. (2005). Flood risk management in the Thames Estuary looking ahead 100 years, doi
  6. (2010). Geographically based Economic data,, last accessed:
  7. (2009). Have past disaster losses increased due to anthropogenic climate change?, doi
  8. (2007). Hazard Mitigation and Preparedness.
  9. (2003). Hurricane Vulnerability in Latin America and The Caribbean: Normalized Damages and Loss Potentials, doi
  10. (2007). Mistreatment of the economic impacts of extreme events in the Stern Review Report on the Economics of Climate Change, doi
  11. (2008). Normalised Australian insured losses from meteorological hazards: 1967-2006, doi
  12. (2009). Normalised flood losses doi
  13. (2008). Normalized hurricane damages in the United States: doi
  14. (1998). Normalized Hurricane Damages in the United States: 1925-1995, Weather and Forecasting, doi
  15. (2002). Stochastic modeling of hurricane damage, doi
  16. (2007). The Economics of Climate Change – The Stern Review, Cambridge: doi
  17. (2006). The Economics of Hurricanes in the United States, Working Paper. New Haven: doi
  18. (2003). Trends in Tropical Cyclone Impact:
  19. (2009). Tropical cyclone losses in the USA and the impact of climate change — A trend analysis based on data from a new approach to adjusting storm losses, doi
  20. (2010). World Development Indicators Online Database. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.