Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

A comparative cost analysis of commodity foods from the U.S. department of agriculture in the national school lunch program

By Cora Peterson

Abstract

Schools that participate in the National School Lunch Program receive a portion of their federal funding as commodity foods rather than cash payments. This research compared the product costs and estimated total procurement costs of commodity and commercial foods from the school district perspective using data from 579 Minnesota ordering sites in school year (SY) 2008–2009. Though comparison of product prices indicates that commercial foods were an average of 17 percent more expensive than equivalent commodity foods, once full estimated procurement costs were included, the commercial products became 9 percent less expensive per food case than commodity products. Base case results were sensitive to the cost of risk to hold inventory. When this input was tested at zero, the estimated cost to procure commercial foods was 2 percent higher per case than commodity foods, though total commercial procurement costs remained less than commodity costs by 3 percent. It is estimated that Minnesota schools collectively spent an additional $1.7 to $3.7 million to procure USDA commodity foods in SY 2008–2009

Topics: HD Industries. Land use. Labor
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Year: 2009
DOI identifier: 10.1002/pam.20458
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:37275
Provided by: LSE Research Online
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com... (external link)
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/37275... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.