Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Self-reporting untoward events to external controllers: accounting for reporting failure by a top tier chemical plant

By Julien Etienne

Abstract

This paper explores the reasons of hazardous organizations for responding to state rules requesting them to report untoward events to public regulators. The literature on external reporting of untoward events remains remarkably limited, and this paper contributes to it by providing a rare empirical account of the micro-level factors and processes behind reporting failures. It builds on empirical research on a case in the French chemical industry. The paper discusses a reporting failure by addressing principally managers' motivations and how they are shaped by the regulatory context, the regulator-regulatee relationship, and the organization's policies and rules. The paper provides also a vivid picture of patterns of over-compliance, compliance and non-compliance by the same regulated organization, and makes suggestions on the power and limits of self-regulation to help fulfil regulatory goals such as self-reporting of untoward events

Topics: K Law (General)
Publisher: Centre for Analysis of Risk and Regulation, London School of Economics and Political Science
Year: 2010
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:36546
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2001b) ‘Is enforced self-regulation a form of risk taking?: The case of railway health and safety, doi
  2. (2010). 60 Minutes doi
  3. (2002). A theory of goal systems’, doi
  4. (2010). AP investigation: oil rig blowout preventers have a long history of breaking down at other wells’,
  5. (2009). Attentional triangulation: learning from unexpected rare crises’, doi
  6. (1990). Autonomy, interdependence, and social control: NASA and the space shuttle Challenger’, doi
  7. (2006). Background to RIDDOR Requirements, the Review and Findings from Stage One.
  8. (2004). Biases in incident reporting databases: an empirical study in the chemical process industry’, doi
  9. (2004). Big field, small potatoes: an empirical assessment of EPA’s self-audit policy’, doi
  10. (2010). BP used riskier method to seal oil well before blast’,
  11. (2004). Central collecting and evaluating of major accidents and near-miss-events in the Federal Republic of Germany – results, experiences, perspectives’, doi
  12. (2008). Coerced confessions: self-policing in the shadow of the regulator’, doi
  13. (2009). Cognitive reactions to rare events: perceptions, uncertainty, and learning’, doi
  14. (2006). Collective Penalties and Inducement of SelfReporting.
  15. (2010). Compliance theory: a goal framing approach’, presented at the Third doi
  16. (2002). Corporate Crime, Law, and Social Control. doi
  17. (1997). Development of communitarian regulation in the chemical industry’, doi
  18. (2000). Environmental self-auditing: setting the proper incentives for discovery and correction of environmental harm’, doi
  19. (2006). Error reporting in organizations’, doi
  20. (2003). Failure in Safety-Critical Systems: A Handbook of Incident and Accident Reporting.
  21. (2000). Greening the Firm. The Politics of Corporate Environmentalism. doi
  22. (2008). How near-misses influence decision making under risk: A missed opportunity for learning’, doi
  23. (2006). How to prevent a normal accident in a highly reliable organization. The art of resilience, a case study in the chemical industry’,
  24. (2008). Incident reporting or storytelling? Competing schemes in a safety-critical and hazardous work setting’, doi
  25. (2004). Incidents/accidents classification and reporting in Statoil’, doi
  26. (1999). Institutional evolution and change: environmentalism and the US chemical industry’, doi
  27. (2007). Investigation Report: Refinery Explosion and Fire,
  28. (2000). It takes both trust and lack of mistrust: the workings of cooperation and relational signaling in contractual relationships’,
  29. (2009). L'interaction régulateur régulé: Considérations à partir du cas d'une entreprise Seveso II seuil haut’, Annales des Mines.
  30. (2003). Loss of Containment Incident Analysis. Sheffield: Health and Safety Laboratory.
  31. (1978). Man-Made Disasters. doi
  32. (1997). Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents.
  33. (1991). Near Miss Reporting as a Safety Tool. doi
  34. (1999). Normal Accidents. Living with High-Risk Technologies. 2nd ed. doi
  35. (1994). Optimal law enforcement with self-reporting of behavior’, doi
  36. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking’, doi
  37. (2001). Regulation and Risk: Occupational Health and Safety on the Railways. doi
  38. (2000). Regulatory Encounters. Multinational Corporations and American Adversarial Legalism. Berkeley (CA): doi
  39. (2007). Reorganising public oversight of high-risk industries in France: a reliability analysis of permitting’, doi
  40. (2003). Shades of Green. Business, Regulation, and Environment. Palo Alto (CA): doi
  41. (2007). Should you turn yourself in? The consequences of environmental self-policing’, doi
  42. (2009). The challenge of empirical research on business compliance in regulatory capitalism’, doi
  43. (2008). The functions and development of safetyspecific trust and distrust’, doi
  44. (2005). The impact of regulations on firms: a case study of the biotech industry’, doi
  45. (2002). The Open Corporation: Effective Self-Regulation and Democracy. doi
  46. (2000). The psychology of doing nothing: forms of decision avoidance result from reason and emotion’, doi
  47. (2005). The recovery window: organizational learning following ambiguous threats’,
  48. (2005). The Review of the Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations doi
  49. (2001). Trust doi
  50. (1999). Trust as an obstacle in environmental-economic disputes’, doi
  51. (2002). Two models of major hazard regulation: recent Australian experience’, doi
  52. (2001). Violator avoidance activities and self-reporting in optimal law enforcement’, doi
  53. (1974). Why the “haves” come out ahead: speculations on the limits of legal change’, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.