Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Feminist myths and magic medicine: the flawed thinking behind calls for further equality legislation

By Catherine Hakim


In this report, Dr Hakim shows that: equal opportunity policies, in regards to women’s access to the labour market in the UK, have been successful; calls for further equality inititiatives (as in the recent Coalition document, The Equalities Strategy), are based on the outdated and wrong assumption that equality of outcomes is either desirable or feasible; the latest acdemic research proves that many men and women have different career aspirations, priorities and life goals. Policy makers should therefore not expect the same job outcomes; calls for further employment legislation targetted at women (eg for quotas on boards of FTSE-100 comanies) should be resisted

Topics: H Social Sciences (General), HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform, HQ The family. Marriage. Woman
Publisher: Centre for Policy Studies
Year: 2011
OAI identifier:
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles


  1. (2010). (2010)’Drive for more women on the board levels off,
  2. (1990). A cross-national comparison of the gender gap in income’, doi
  3. (2002). A Mind of Her Own, doi
  4. (2009). American Time Use Survey- doi
  5. (1997). and Hemerijck A doi
  6. (2005). Are We There Yet?: doi
  7. (2008). Changing the gender balance in caring: fatherhood and the division of parental leave in Norway’, doi
  8. (2003). Constraints and choices in mothers’ employment careers: a consideration of Hakim’s Preference Theory’, doi
  9. (2006). Dead End Feminism, doi
  10. (2004). Defending equality of outcome’, doi
  11. (1996). Desperately seeking differences: is management style gendered?’, doi
  12. Directorate General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities (2005a) Social Agenda,
  13. Directorate General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities (2005b) Confronting Demographic Change: A New Solidarity Between the Generations –
  14. (2002). Discrimination Law, doi
  15. (2007). Educational homogamy in 22 European countries’, doi
  16. (2010). European Board Diversity Analysis 2010: Is it getting easier to find women on European boards?, Paris: Egon Zehnder International. Available online from: Ellingsæter A L
  17. European Commission (2007a) Discrimination in the European Union: Special Eurobarometer.
  18. (1996). Feminist fallacies: a reply to Hakim on women’s employment’ and ‘Whose myths are they anyway: a comment’, doi
  19. (2008). Fishing in Utopia,
  20. (1995). Five feminist myths about women’s employment’, doi
  21. (2010). Flexible Working Time Arrangements and Gender Equality: A Comparative Review of 30 European Countries,
  22. (1998). Gender and Jobs: Sex Segregation of Occupations in the World, doi
  23. (2001). Gender Pay Gap: A Review, doi
  24. (2008). Gender, culture and non-financial employment commitment in Britain and Sweden’, doi
  25. Government Equalities Office (2010a) The Gender Equality Duty,
  26. Government Equalities Office (2010b) The Equality Strategy – Building a Fairer Britain,
  27. (2007). Having it all no longer: fertility, female labour supply, and the new life choices of generation X’, doi
  28. (1976). Housewife, Harmondsworth: Penguin. OECD
  29. (2008). Is gender equality legislation becoming counterproductive?’, Public Policy Review, Hakim C doi
  30. (2003). Is there a glass ceiling in Sweden?’, doi
  31. (2010). Leading chairmen back push to put more women in boardrooms’,
  32. (1998). Managing Like a Man: Women and Men doi
  33. (2008). Modelling the gender pay gap in the UK 1998-2006’, doi
  34. (2000). Models of cross-national variation in occupational sex segregation’, doi
  35. (2003). Models of the Family in Modern Societies: Ideals and Realities, doi
  36. (2005). Nachhaltige Familienpolitik (Sustainable Family Policy), Berlin: Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend (Ministry for the Family, Pensioners, Women and Children).
  37. (1999). O’Reilly A and Dix G doi
  38. (2004). Occupational Ghettos: The Worldwide Segregation of Women and Men, Stanford CA: doi
  39. (1997). Occupational segregation by sex in Nordic countries: An empirical investigation’,
  40. (2007). Parental Care and Employment in Early Childhood, Working Paper No. 57, Manchester: Equal Opportunities Commission.
  41. (2009). Private Company reporting of Workforce Diveristy Data, London: Government Equalities Office.
  42. (2006). Searching for policy levers to raise fertility’.
  43. (2005). Sex differences in work-life balance goals’, pp 55-79
  44. (2008). Should We Mind the Gap? Gender Pay Differentials and Public Policy, London: Institute of Economic Affairs. doi
  45. (1998). Structure, culture, and sex segregation in Europe’,
  46. (2006). Study of mathematically precocious youth after 35 years’, doi
  47. (2010). The Coalition: our programme for government,
  48. (1997). The Concentration of Women’s Employment and Relative Occupational Pay: A Statistical Framework for Comparative Analysis, Labour Market and Social Policy Occasional Papers No. 26, doi
  49. (2007). The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools and Societies, doi
  50. (2010). The Equality Illusion: The truth about women and men today,
  51. (2010). The Equality Strategy – Building a Fairer Britain,
  52. (1995). The gender gap in workplace authority: a cross-national study’, doi
  53. (2010). The Gender Pay Gap in Europe from a Legal Perspective,
  54. (2006). The Gender Pay Gap: Origins and Policy Responses,
  55. (2008). The household division of labour: changes in families’ allocation of paid and unpaid work’, doi
  56. (2007). The politics of female diversity in the 21st century’, doi
  57. (1990). The Second Shift, doi
  58. (2009). The Sex Diaries,
  59. (2004). The Time Divide: Work, Family and Gender Inequality, doi
  60. (2002). The transition in East Germany: when is a ten-point fall in the gender wage gap bad news?’, doi
  61. (2005). Then and Now,
  62. (2009). Towards a European Union Gender Equality Index’, doi
  63. (2008). Two into one won’t go’,
  64. (2003). Understanding international differences in the gender pay gap’, doi
  65. (2009). Why are there so few female top executives in egalitarian welfare states?’,
  66. (2005). Why Men Earn More, doi
  67. (2008). Women and Employment: Changing Lives and New Challenges, doi
  68. (2010). Women at the Top: the top 50 women in world business, London: Financial Times.
  69. (2002). Women at work’, doi
  70. (2003). Women Don’t Ask: Negotiation and the Gender Divide, doi
  71. (2006). Women, careers, and work-life preferences’, doi
  72. (2007). Women’s career patterns: A study of Swedish women born in the 1950s’, doi
  73. (2009). Work preferences, life values, and personal views of top math/science graduate students and the profoundly gifted: developmental changes and gender differences during emerging adulthood and parenthood’, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.