Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Counterfactuals though experiments, and singular causal analysis in history

By Julian Reiss

Abstract

Thought experiments are ubiquitous in science but especially prominent in domains in which experimental and observational data are scarce. Thus, for instance, when the causal analysis of singular events such as the causes of a particular war, of the rise of a culture or of the economic performance of a country in a specific historical period is at stake. A longstanding tradition in history that goes back to Max Weber answers questions about the causes of singular historical events by means of ‘What-if?’ counterfactuals. The aim of this paper is twofold. First, I want to give a descriptive account of this widely used method in history. Second, I argue that historians who follow this method examine difference makers rather than causes in the philosophers’ sense, despite their surface rhetoric. I conclude that although difference making is neither necessary nor sufficient for causation in the philosophers’ sense, looking for difference makers is more consistent with the historians’ more ultimate purposes

Topics: BC Logic, D History (General)
Publisher: The University of Chicago Press
Year: 2009
DOI identifier: 10.1086/605826
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:36451
Provided by: LSE Research Online
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://journal.philsci.org/ (external link)
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/36451... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.