Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

A generalised model of judgment aggregation

By Franz Dietrich

Abstract

The new field of judgment aggregation aims to merge many individual sets of judgments on logically interconnected propositions into a single collective set of judgments on these propositions. Judgment aggregation has commonly been studied using classical propositional logic, with a limited expressive power and a problematic representation of conditional statements (“if P then Q ”) as material conditionals. In this methodological paper, I present a simple unified model of judgment aggregation in general logics. I show how many realistic decision problems can be represented in it. This includes decision problems expressed in languages of standard propositional logic, predicate logic (e.g. preference aggregation problems), modal or conditional logics, and some multi-valued or fuzzy logics. I provide a list of simple tools for working with general logics, and I prove impossibility results that generalise earlier theorems

Topics: BC Logic
Publisher: Springer Nature
Year: 2007
DOI identifier: 10.1007/s00355-006-0187-y
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:35825
Provided by: LSE Research Online
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://www.springerlink.com/co... (external link)
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/35825... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.