Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

To be or not to be involved: a questionnaire-experimental view on Harsanyi’s utilitarian ethics

By Yoram Amiel, Frank A. Cowell and Wulf Gaertner

Abstract

According to standard theory founded on Harsanyi (J Polit Econ 61:434–435, 1953; 63:309–321, 1955) a social welfare function can be appropriately based on the individual’s approach to choice under uncertainty. We investigate how people really do rank distributions in terms of welfare. According to Harsanyi, the evaluation can be done from the standpoint of an uninvolved external judge, a public official, for example, or by a person who knows that she holds one of the positions in society, with an equal chance for any of the available positions. Are these two structures to be viewed differently? We use a questionnaire experiment to focus on the two different interpretations of the Harsanyi approach. There are important, systematic differences that transcend the cultural background of respondents

Topics: BJ Ethics, HA Statistics, HB Economic Theory, JC Political theory
Year: 2009
DOI identifier: 10.1007/s00355-008-0324-x
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:35806
Provided by: LSE Research Online
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://www.springer.com/econom... (external link)
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/35806... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.