Correction To `deriving Dg Categories'

Abstract

F11.81> 0 are short exact for all A 2 A and all n 2 Z. The isomorphisms . . . The rest of the proof (from line 11 on page 71 onwards) remains unchanged. The (omitted) proof of theorem 3.2 should be changed accordingly. A (much less important) mistake is the use of the word `at' in the article [2]: whenever it refers to a complex M of k-modules, it should be interpreted as meaning that the functor M k ? takes (possibly unbounded) acyclic complexes of k-modules to acyclic complexes. Date: May 26, 2000. 1 2 BERNHARD KELLER Reference

Download PDF:
_{Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):}

http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/v... (external link)

http://www.math.jussieu.fr/~ke... (external link)