Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Paasche vs. Laspeyres: the elasticity of substitution and bias in measures of TFP growth

By Alwyn Young

Abstract

In recent papers, Nelson and Pack (1995) , Rodrik (1997), and Hsieh (1997a) argue that standard measures of total factor productivity growth in countries where the capital-labour ratio has risen rapidly, e.g. the East Asian NICS, will understate true productivity growth if the elasticity of substitution is less than one and there is labour augmenting technical change. This note shows that this argument increases a Paasche measure of productivity, at the expense of lowering a Laspeyres estimate. The conditions under which total factor productivity growth is consistently underestimated are clarified

Topics: HB Economic Theory
Publisher: National bureau of economic research
Year: 1998
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:35415
Provided by: LSE Research Online
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://www.nber.org/papers/w66... (external link)
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/35415... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.