Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Hicksian income in the conceptual framework

By Michael Bromwich, Richard Macve and Shyam Sunder

Abstract

In seeking to replace accounting conventions by concepts in the pursuit of principles-based standards, the FASB/IASB joint project on the conceptual framework has grounded its approach on a well-known definition of income by Hicks. We welcome the use of theories by accounting standard setters and practitioners, if theories are considered in their entirety. Cherry-picking parts of a theory to serve the immediate aims of standard setters risks distortion. Misunderstanding and misinterpretation of the selected elements of a theory increase the distortion even more. We argue that the Boards have selectively picked from, misquoted, misunderstood and misapplied Hicksian concepts of income. We explore some alternative approaches to income suggested by Hicks and by other writers, and their relevance to current debates over the Boards' conceptual framework and standards. Our conclusions about how accounting concepts and conventions should be related differ from those of the Boards. Executive stock options (ESOs) provide an illustrative case study

Topics: HF5601 Accounting
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing
Year: 2010
DOI identifier: 10.1111/j.1467-6281.2010.00322.x
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:35279
Provided by: LSE Research Online
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.14... (external link)
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/35279... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.