Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Is fiscal decentralization harmful for economic growth? Evidence from the OECD countries

By Roberto Ezcurra and Andrés Rodríguez-Pose

Abstract

The global drive towards decentralization has been increasingly justified on the basis that greater transfers of resources to subnational governments are expected to deliver greater efficiency in the provision of public goods and services and greater economic growth. This paper examines whether this is the case, by analysing the relationship between decentralization and economic growth in 21 OECD countries during the period between 1990 and 2005 and controlling not only for fiscal decentralization, but also for political and administrative decentralization. The results point towards a negative and significant association between fiscal decentralization and economic growth in the sample countries, a relationship which is robust to the inclusion of a series of control variables and to differences in expenditure preferences by subnational governments. The impact of political and administrative decentralization on economic growth is weaker and sensitive to the definition and measurement of political decentralization

Topics: HC Economic History and Conditions, HJ Public Finance
Publisher: Spatial Economics Research Centre (SERC), London School of Economics and Political Science
Year: 2010
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:33518
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. doi
  2. (2004). An agenda for a growing Europe: the Sapir report. doi
  3. (1994). Automatic lag selection in covariance matrix estimation, doi
  4. (2004). Comparative federalism and decentralization: On meaning and measurement, doi
  5. (1996). Competitive governments: An economic theory of politics and public finance. Cambridge: doi
  6. (2004). Contrasting visions of multi-level governance. In Multi-level governance, edited by I. Bache doi
  7. (1992). Convergence, doi
  8. (1994). Decentralisation: A survey of literature from a human development perspective. doi
  9. (2005). Decentralization and economic growth revisited: an empirical note, doi
  10. (1994). Decentralization and its implications for urban service delivery. Urban Management Program Discussion Paper 16, World Bank. doi
  11. (2003). Decentralization: conceptualization and measurement, doi
  12. (2004). Determinants of long-term growth: a Bayesian averaging of classical estimates (BACE) approach, doi
  13. (1997). Disunited States. doi
  14. (1991). Economic growth in a cross-section of countries, doi
  15. (1986). Federal theory. Canberra,: Centre for Research on Federal Financial Relations, doi
  16. (2000). Federalism. doi
  17. (2003). Fiscal decentralisation and economic growth in high-income OECD countries, doi
  18. (2009). Fiscal decentralisation, efficiency, and growth, doi
  19. (1993). Fiscal decentralization and economic development, doi
  20. (2000). Fiscal decentralization and economic growth doi
  21. (2009). Fiscal decentralization and economic growth in OECD Countries: Is there a relationship? CESIFO Working Paper No. doi
  22. (2007). Fiscal decentralization and economic growth reconsidered, doi
  23. (2003). Fiscal decentralization and economic growth, doi
  24. (1998). Fiscal decentralization and economic growth: a cross country study, doi
  25. (1998). Fiscal decentralization and IDC economic growth: An empirical investigation, doi
  26. (2002). Fiscal decentralization contributes to economic growth: evidence from state-level cross-section data for the United States, doi
  27. (1998). Fiscal decentralization, public spending and economic growth in China, doi
  28. (1972). Fiscal federalism. doi
  29. (1999). Fiscal policy and growth: Evidence from OECD countries. doi
  30. (2007). Government expenditures and economic growth: The supply and demand sides, doi
  31. (1986). Government size and economic growth: a new framework and some evidence from cross-section and time series data,
  32. (1987). Hypothesis testing with efficient method of moments estimation, doi
  33. (2000). International data on educational attainment: Updates and implications. doi
  34. (2004). Is there a global link between regional disparities and devolution?, doi
  35. (2005). Local decentralization and local economic growth: A cross-sectional examination of US metropolitan areas, doi
  36. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. doi
  37. (1997). Market-preserving fiscal federalism in the American Monetary Union. doi
  38. (2005). On the “economic dividend” of devolution, doi
  39. (2002). On the measurement and impact of fiscal decentralization, Policy Research Working Paper 2809, World Bank. doi
  40. (2004). PRSPs in decentralized contexts: Comparative lessons on local planning and fiscal dimensions. Washington DC:
  41. (2005). Public sector decentralisation: Measurement concepts and recent international trends, doi
  42. (2004). Razones económicas para un nuevo Marco Institucional, available at: http://www.lehendakaritza.ejgv.euskadi.net/r48-27 2312/es/contenidos/informes/mem_razones_economicas/es_7465/razones_econo micas.html.
  43. (2008). Regional authority in 42 democracies, 1950–2006: A measure and five hypotheses, doi
  44. (2005). Society, community and economic development, doi
  45. (1996). The composition of public expenditure and economic growth. doi
  46. (1995). The dangers of decentralization, doi
  47. (2004). The economic (in)efficiency of devolution, doi
  48. (2002). The evolution of regionalism in doi
  49. (2003). The global trend towards devolution and its implications, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy doi
  50. (2001). The growth impact of intersectoral and intergovernmental allocation of public expenditure: With applications to China and India, doi
  51. (2008). The link between fiscal decentralization and regional disparities: Evidence from several European Union countries, doi
  52. (1980). The power to tax: Analytical foundations of a fiscal constitution. Cambridge: doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.