Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Comparative international law: the role of national courts in creating and enforcing international law

By Anthea Roberts

Abstract

Academics, practitioners and international and national courts are increasingly seeking to identify and interpret international law by engaging in comparative analyses of various domestic court decisions. This emerging phenomenon, which I term ‘comparative international law’, loosely fuses international law (as a matter of substance) with comparative law (as a matter of process). However, this comparative process is seriously complicated by the ambiguous role that national court decisions play in the international law doctrine of sources, under which they provide evidence of the practice of the forum State as well as being a subsidiary means for determining international law. This article analyses these dual, and sometimes conflicting, roles of national courts and the impact of this duality on the comparative international law process

Topics: K Law (General)
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Year: 2011
DOI identifier: 10.1017/S0020589310000679
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:33307
Provided by: LSE Research Online
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://journals.cambridge.org/... (external link)
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/33307... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.