Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Whose preferences count?

By Paul Dolan

Abstract

An important consideration when choosing how to allocate health care resources is the improvements in patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL) that alternative allocations generate. There is considerable debate about whose preferences should be used when measuring and valuing HRQoL. This debate has usually been in terms of whether the values of patients or the general public are the most appropriate. It is argued in this paper that this is a false dichotomy that does not facilitate understanding of empirical evidence. Nor, more importantly, does it address one of the most important issues in the debate about whose preferences count, that is, whether the fact that many people adapt to poor health states should be taken into account when ascribing values to those states. A conceptual framework is developed to facilitate a more fruitful discussion of the issues relating to the question of whose preferences should count

Topics: RA Public aspects of medicine
Publisher: Sage
Year: 1999
DOI identifier: 10.1177/0272989X9901900416
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:33079
Provided by: LSE Research Online
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://mdm.sagepub.com/ (external link)
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/33079... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.