Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Clashing strategic cultures and climate policy

By Megan Ceronsky, Cameron Hepburn, Michael Obersteiner and Yoshiki Yamagata

Abstract

Kagan (2002) argues that the different responses of Europeans and Americans to major strategic and international challenges is not simply due to differences in the current administrations, but rather results from (i) a power gap and (ii) differing ideologies. This article applies Kagan's theory to climate policy, employing terrorism policy as a point of comparison. We argue that the power gap between Europe and America is unable to explain the differences in climate policy. In contrast, the ideology gap may indeed have some explanatory value. Furthermore, we argue that one additional feature is critical - the costs and benefits imposed by climate change and terrorism prevention, and the process by which such costs and benefits are evaluated, differ between America and Europe

Topics: GE Environmental Sciences
Publisher: Earthscan
Year: 2005
DOI identifier: 10.1080/14693062.2004.9685530
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:32965
Provided by: LSE Research Online
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://www.earthscan.co.uk/?ta... (external link)
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/32965... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.