Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Measuring the quality of long-term care in England

By Juliette Malley

Abstract

Improving the quality of long-term care has been central to the agenda of successive UK Governments since the late 1980s and a number of mechanisms have been introduced to achieve this end. The quality assurance framework that exists in England is comprehensive and supported by legislation. It is also supported by a number of national quality measures, including performance indicators from administrative systems to user surveys and composite measures of quality. There is close interaction between the quality assurance system and the collection of data for quality measures; additionally, the measures are used to support quality assurance activities. This relationship has consequences for the accuracy and validity of the measures

Topics: HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology, RA Public aspects of medicine
Publisher: European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies
Year: 2010
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:32657
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2010). A Report on the Development Studies for the National Adult Social Care User Experience Survey, Discussion Paper 2721.
  2. Advancing public accountability? The social services ‘star’ ratings. doi
  3. Best value – total quality management for local government? doi
  4. (2010). Building the National Care Service, CM7854. London: The Stationery Office,
  5. (2009). Continental Research. CSCI Quality Ratings. Market Research Report. London: Commission for Social Care Inspection,
  6. (2006). Department of Health. Our Health, Our Care, Our Say: A New Direction for Community Services, Cm6737. London: The Stationery Office, doi
  7. (1980). Explorations on Quality Assessment and Monitoring. The Definition of Quality and Approaches to its Assessment.
  8. Has social care performance in England improved? An analysis of performance ratings across social services organisations. Policy Studies 2009;30(4):403–22. 14. Social Services Inspectorate. doi
  9. How do performance indicators add up? An examination of composite indicators in public services. doi
  10. Improving the quality of longterm care with better information. doi
  11. (1998). London: The Stationery Office, doi
  12. (2005). Outcomes: Developing a New Performance Framework. London: The Stationery Office,
  13. (2002). Performance Ratings for Social Services in England 2001–2002. London: Department of Health,
  14. (2009). Position Paper Social Care. London: Department for Health,
  15. (2010). Quality Commission. The State of Health Care and Adult Social Care in England. Key Themes and Quality of Services in 2009. London: The Stationery Office,
  16. (2006). Structure and logic of regulation and governance of quality of health care: was OFSTED a model for the Commission for Health Improvement? Health Economics, Policy and Law doi
  17. (2007). The New Performance Framework for Local Authorities and Local Authority Partnerships: Single Set of National Indicators.
  18. (2009). The State of Social Care in England 2007–08. London: The Stationery Office,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.