Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Validity of the eating disorders examination-questionnaire when used with adolescents with bulimia nervosa and atypical bulimia nervosa.

By Jennifer Beecham, H. Dawson, N. Pretorius, G. Waller, J. Arcelus, F. Doherty, I. Eisler, C. Gallagher, S. Gowers, G. Isaacs, Eric Johnson-Sabine, A. Jones, C. Newell, J. Morris, L. Richardson, S. Ringwood, L. Rowlands, M. Simic, J. Treasure, C. Williams, I. Yi, M. Yoshioka and U. Schmidt


OBJECTIVE: To validate the online questionnaire form of the Eating Disorders Examination (EDE-Q) against the interview version (EDE) in a clinic and community sample of adolescents with bulimia nervosa (BN) or atypical BN (eating disorder not otherwise specified with bulimic features - EDNOS-BN). METHOD: Adolescents with BN (N=58) or EDNOS-BN (N=37) completed the EDE over the telephone and the EDE-Q online. RESULTS: There were moderate to high correlations between the attitudinal scales. Eating was rated as more pathological on the EDE-Q than the EDE, except dietary restraint. As in research among adults, agreement between the two measures was low regarding binge eating episodes, but better for vomiting episodes. When compared with the EDE, the EDE-Q attitudinal scales were more valid for BN than for EDNOS-BN patients, and more valid for the clinic sample. CONCLUSION: The online version of the EDE-Q has partial validity for use with adolescents. The EDE-Q might be reporting a more accurate description of current status, as it avoids possible filtering and approval aspects

Topics: RA Public aspects of medicine
Publisher: Editrice Kurtis
Year: 2009
OAI identifier:
Provided by: LSE Research Online
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • (external link)
  • (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.