Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Resolving the Anglo-German industrial productivity puzzle, 1895–1935: a response to Professor Ritschl

By Stephen Broadberry and Carsten Burhop

Abstract

This response offers a critical appraisal of the claim of Albrecht Ritschl to have found a possible resolution to what he calls the Anglo-German industrial productivity puzzle, which arose as the result of a new industrial production index produced in an earlier paper by the same author. Projection back from a widely accepted 1935/36 benchmark using the Ritschl index showed German industrial labor productivity in 1907 substantially higher than in Britain. This presented a puzzle for at least two reasons. First, other comparative information from the pre—World War I period, such as wages, seems difficult to square with much higher German labor productivity at this time. Second, a direct benchmark estimate produced by Stephen Broadberry and Carsten Burhop, using production census information for Britain and industrial survey material of similar quality for Germany, suggested broadly equal labor productivity in 1907. Broadberry and Burhop also showed that if Walther Hoffmann's industrial output index was used instead of the Ritschl index for Germany, the puzzle largely disappeared

Topics: DA Great Britain, DD Germany, HC Economic History and Conditions
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Year: 2008
DOI identifier: 10.1017/S0022050708000685
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:32339
Provided by: LSE Research Online
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://journals.cambridge.org/... (external link)
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/32339... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.