Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Using the P90/P10 index to measure U.S. inequality trends with current population survey data: a view from inside the census bureau vaults

By Richard V. Burkhauser, Shuaizhang Feng and Stephen P. Jenkins

Abstract

The March Current Population Survey (CPS) is the primary data source for estimation of levels and trends in U.S. earnings and income inequality. However, time-inconsistency problems related to top coding lead many CPS users to measure inequality via the ratio of the 90th to the 10th percentile (P90/P10) rather than by more traditional summary measures. With access to public use and restricted-access internal CPS data, and by applying bounding methods, we show that using P90/P10 does not completely obviate time-inconsistency problems, especially in capturing household income inequality trends. Using internal data, we create consistent cell mean values for all top-coded public use values that, when used with public use data, closely track inequality trends in earnings and household income using internal data. But estimates of longer-term inequality trends with these corrected data based on P90/P10 differ from those based on the Gini coefficient. The choice of inequality measure still matters

Topics: HA Statistics, HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell
Year: 2009
DOI identifier: 10.1111/j.1475-4991.2008.00305.x
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:32041
Provided by: LSE Research Online
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://www.wiley.com/bw/journa... (external link)
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/32041... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.