Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Anthropology of secularism

By Fenella Cannell

Abstract

Recent debates on this topic have been heavily shaped by two paradigms: Asad's deconstructivism and Taylor's Catholic/Hegelian revisionism. This article outlines the arguments of each but frames them within the longer history of arguments that make claims for the reality of secularization and alternate sources for claims that “the secular” is a historically constructed category, including arguments from radical theology and (differently) in the anthropology of India. It is argued that implicit claims for the hierarchical ordering of reality in modernity, in which the political is seen as more real than the religious, continue to create disjunctures in the range of debate that new ethnography has the opportunity to address

Topics: BL Religion, GN Anthropology
Publisher: Annual Reviews
Year: 2010
DOI identifier: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.105039
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:31974
Provided by: LSE Research Online
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/31974... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.