Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Modelling the moral dimension of decisions

By Mark Colyvan, Damian Cox and Katie Siobhan Steele

Abstract

In this paper we explore the connections between ethics and decision theory. In particular, we consider the question of whether decision theory carries with it a bias towards consequentialist ethical theories. We argue that there are plausible versions of the other ethical theories that can be accommodated by “standard” decision theory, but there are also variations of these ethical theories that are less easily accommodated. So while “standard” decision theory is not exclusively consequentialist, it is not necessarily ethically neutral. Moreover, even if our decision-theoretic models get the right answers vis-`a-vis morally correct action, the question remains as to whether the motivation for the non-consequentialist theories and the psychological processes of the agents who subscribe to those ethical theories are lost or poorly represented in the resulting models

Topics: B Philosophy (General)
Publisher: Wiley- Blackwell
Year: 2010
DOI identifier: 10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00754.x
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:31938
Provided by: LSE Research Online
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://www.blackwellpublishing... (external link)
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/31938... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.