Article thumbnail

Zoning and Landmark Regulation of Religious Institutions after City of Boerne v. Flores

By Alan C Weinstein

Abstract

RFRA was enacted four years ago to overturn the Supreme Court\u27s controversial 1990 decision in Employment Division, Department of Human Resources v. Smith because, according to the Act\u27s proponents, that case made it too difficult for plaintiffs to prevail on claims that government regulations substantially burdened their religious practices. The constitutionality of the statute was immediately called into question and last term the Supreme Court struck it down in City of Boerne v. Flores. An analysis of cases involving challenges to landmark and zoning regulations affecting religious institutions before and during RFRA indicates that while challenges to general zoning regulations are unlikely to be successful in the future, litigants can expect greater success in challenging landmark designations

Topics: Religious Freedom Restoration Act, zoning, landmark regulations, historic preservation, Land Use Law, Urban Studies
Publisher: EngagedScholarship@CSU
Year: 1997
OAI identifier: oai:engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu:fac_articles-1560
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • https://engagedscholarship.csu... (external link)
  • http://scholar.csuohio.edu/rec... (external link)

  • To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

    Suggested articles