Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The powers of emptiness

By Derek Hook


Foucault is often considered to be the commensurate theorist of power. His late work provides an impressive array of concepts that enables a multi-dimensional analysis of the historical, material, and discursive facets of power. What is missing from this approach, however, is the factor of passionate attachments, or what we might term the sublime motivations that underlie any regime of control. Lacan’s ethical thought prioritizes precisely the issue of the sublime, and, more to the point, the process of sublimation which establishes an effective “short-circuit” between socially valorized objects and direct drive satisfactions of individuals. Key here is the notion of das Ding, the place of the absent object of primordial satisfaction that generates libidinal enjoyment and draws the subject toward the pinnacle of social valorization. Lacan thus shows us what Foucault cannot theorize. That is to say, if sublimation consists of a relation to the real of das Ding, then it cannot be limited in the terms of its activation to the powers of discursive domain alone; it remains a self-initiating and self-regulating form of power

Topics: BF Psychology
Publisher: SAGE
Year: 2010
DOI identifier: 10.1177/0959354310383912
OAI identifier:
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles


  1. (2000). A Lacanian view of some impasses doi
  2. (2008). Between two deaths': The intersection of psychoanalysis and Japanese Buddhism. doi
  3. (2001). Discourse, knowledge, materiality, history. doi
  4. (2007). Eating the book: On the centrality of sublimation and knowledge in Lacan’s Ethics.
  5. (2009). Eros and ethics reading Jacques Lacan’s Seminar VII.
  6. (2000). Ethics of the real,
  7. (1993). Feminism and the self. doi
  8. (2007). Foucault, psychology and the analytics of power. doi
  9. (1991). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self. London & doi
  10. (1999). Governmentality. Power and rule in modern society. London & doi
  11. (1969). Identity and difference. doi
  12. (2001). Identity through a psychoanalytic looking glass. doi
  13. (1996). Inventing our selves. London & doi
  14. is a lecturer in social psychology at the London School of Economics and a visiting associate professor
  15. (1995). Lacan and Bion: Psychoanalysis and the mystical language of `unsaying'. doi
  16. (2005). Lacanian discourse analysis in psychology: Seven theoretical elements. doi
  17. (2009). On power, freedom, and gender: A fruitful tension between Foucault and feminism. doi
  18. (2008). Psychoanalysis: Formalization and logic and the question of speaking and affect. doi
  19. (2008). Psychoanalytic theory and psychology: Conditions of possibility for clinical and cultural practice. doi
  20. (2008). Psychology and psychoanalysis in Brazil: From cultural syncretism to the collapse of liberal individualism. doi
  21. (1994). Read my desire Lacan against the historicists. doi
  22. (1991). Social Psychology and the rhetoric of truth. doi
  23. (2002). Stealing the Mona Lisa.
  24. (1993). Tarrying with the negative: Kant, Hegel and the critique of ideology. doi
  25. (1988). Technologies of the self. In doi
  26. (1988). The care of the self: The history of sexuality
  27. (1988). The ethic of care for the self as a practice of freedom. doi
  28. (1988). The political technology of individuals. In
  29. (1992). The seminar of Jacques Lacan: Book VII the ethics of psychoanalysis 1959-1960. doi
  30. (1925). The standard edition of the complete psychological works of doi
  31. (2007). The subject as drop-out: Cultural accountability and the ethics of psychoanalysis and humanistic psychology, doi
  32. (2000). The thing from inner space. doi
  33. (1966). Three essays on the theory of sexuality. In doi
  34. (2010). Towards a "critical ontology of ourselves"?: Foucault, subjectivity and discourse analysis. doi
  35. (1991). Truth and Eros: Foucault, Lacan and the question of ethics. London & doi
  36. (1999). Where does power come from?
  37. (2003). Žižek a critical introduction. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.