Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Globalization and the empowerment of women: an analysis of spatial dependence via trade and foreign direct investment

By Eric Neumayer and Indra De Soysa


Previous studies of globalization’s effects on women’s rights have mostly focused on employment and wage ratios, but even if women’s earnings improve, they might suffer greater exploitation at work and at home. Further, these studies use general measures of a country’s openness to trade and foreign direct investment (FDI). Does it, however, also matter who one trades with and where one receives FDI from? This article tests the hypothesis that higher women’s economic and social rights in foreign countries with which the domestic country is connected via trade and FDI spill-over into higher rights among the laggards — a phenomenon known as spatial dependence. Analyzing women’s rights over the period 1981 to 2007 in a global sample and samples of countries at different stages of economic development, we find consistent evidence for spill-over effects via trade links, with the exception of a sample of low-income countries. We also find some evidence for similar effects via FDI, but only for economic rights and only in middle-income countries. Globalization does seem to open the door for the empowerment of women through contact between high-standards and low-standard countries

Topics: HF Commerce, HM Sociology, HQ The family. Marriage. Woman
Publisher: Elsevier
Year: 2011
DOI identifier: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.12.008
OAI identifier:
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles


  1. (2007). A short note on the theme of too many instruments. doi
  2. (2000). Accounting for Gender in Asian Economic Growth. doi
  3. (1998). Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks doi
  4. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. doi
  5. (1981). Biases in dynamic models with fixed-effects. doi
  6. (2009). Cingranelli and Richards Human Rights Dataset. doi
  7. (2002). Core labour standards and foreign direct investment. doi
  8. (1999). Development as Freedom. doi
  9. (1997). Development as History and Process. In
  10. (2007). Economic globalization and women’s employment: the case of manufacturing in Mexico. doi
  11. (1995). Economic reform and the process of global integration. doi
  12. (2002). Effects of Trade Liberalization on the Gender Wage Gap
  13. (2006). Endnotes 1 The same is true of course for women’s political rights, but the vast majority of countries grant women ‘good’ to ‘very good’ political rights already (Paxton et al.
  14. (2001). Engendering Development: Through Gender Equality in Rights, Resources, and Voice. doi
  15. (2004). Fashioning Inequality: the Multinational Company and Gendered Employment in a Globalizing World.
  16. (2003). Fixed effects ordered probit regression. College Station, MD: Stata Corporation. Taylor, I.
  17. (2007). Foreign direct investment and gendered wages in urban China. doi
  18. (2009). Foreign direct investment database. doi
  19. (2004). Gender and Globalization: A Macroeconomic Perspective. Working Paper 19. Geneva: International Labour Office.
  20. (2000). Gender Inequality and Economic Growth: A Cross-country Analysis. doi
  21. (2006). Gender Inequality and Trade. doi
  22. (2000). Gender segregation and gender bias in manufacturing trade expansion: revisiting the “Wood Asymmetry”. World Development, doi
  23. (1997). Gender Wage Inequality and Export-Led Growth in South Korea, doi
  24. (2003). Gender, Development and Globalization. doi
  25. (1999). Global Feminization Through Flexible Labor: A Theme Revisited. doi
  26. (1998). Global Trade Expansion and Liberalization: Gender Issues and Impacts. A study prepared for the
  27. (2001). Globalization and Gender: A European Perspective." doi
  28. (2007). Globalization and Militarism: Feminists Make the Link. doi
  29. (2009). Globalization and the Gender Wage Gap. doi
  30. (2007). Globalization, states and social rights: negotiating women’s economic citizenship in the Maghreb. doi
  31. (2007). Globalization, Women’s Economic Rights and Forced Labour. World Economy, doi
  32. (2002). Globalization/Antiglobalization.
  33. (2009). Human Development Report. doi
  34. (2004). Importing Equality? The Impact of Globalization on Gender Discrimination. doi
  35. (2004). International Trade and Gender Wage Discrimination: Evidence from East Asia. doi
  36. (2004). Islam, Authoritarianism, and Female Empowerment: What Are the Linkages? World Politics, doi
  37. (1999). Labor Markets as Gendered Institutions: Equality, Efficiency and Empowerment Issues. World Development, doi
  38. (2010). Model Specification in the Analysis of Spatial Dependence. doi
  39. (2000). Modeling the Effect of Trade on Women, at Work and at Home. World Development, doi
  40. (2001). Modelling regional effects on state policy diffusion. doi
  41. (1999). Multinational Enterprises and the Prospects for Justice.
  42. (2008). Oil, Islam and Women. doi
  43. (2005). Panel Data Analysis in Comparative Politics. Linking Method to Theory. doi
  44. (2005). Policy Learning, Policy Diffusion and the Making of a New Order. doi
  45. (2006). Polity IV data sets. doi
  46. (2002). Puzzles of Women’s Rights in Brazil.
  47. (2006). Race, gender, and work in São Paulo, doi
  48. (2007). Racing to the Bottom of Climbing to the Top? Economic Globalization and Collective Labor Rights. doi
  49. (2001). Realizing Labor Standards: How Transparency, Competition, and Sanctions Could Improve Working Conditions Worldwide.
  50. (1997). Regulatory competition and international cooperation. doi
  51. (2004). Remodeling the Competition for Capital: How Domestic Politics Erases the Race to the Bottom. doi
  52. (1984). Sex and Advantage – A Comparative, Macro-Structural Theory of Sex Stratification. doi
  53. (2009). Spatial dynamic panel model and system GMM: a Monte Carlo investigation. Working Paper. doi
  54. (2008). The Cingranelli-Richards (CIRI) Human Rights Data Project Coding Manual. Cingranelli, doi
  55. (2007). The Feminist Economics of Trade. doi
  56. (2008). The Feminist Political Economy of the Rent-Seeking Society: An Investigation of Gender Inequality and Economic Growth.
  57. (2005). The Gender Question in Globalization: Changing Perspectives and Practices. doi
  58. (2005). The Global Diffusion of Regulatory Capitalism. doi
  59. (2004). The Globalization of Liberalization: Policy Diffusion in the International Political Economy. doi
  60. (2000). The Globalized Woman: Reports from a Future of Inequality.
  61. (2006). The great equalizer? Globalization effects on gender equality
  62. (2002). The Impact of the Multinational in Development: An Ethical Challenge.
  63. (2005). The Polarized World of Globalization. Global Policy Forum.
  64. (2007). The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism. doi
  65. (1998). The Spotlight and the Bottom Line: How Multinationals Export Human Rights. Foreign Affairs, doi
  66. (2005). Theories of Policy Diffusion. Lessons from Latin American Pension Reform. World Politics, doi
  67. (2009). Trade-based Diffusion of Labor Rights: A Panel Study, doi
  68. (2010). When Do Governments Promote Women’s Rights? A Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Sex Equity Policy. doi
  69. (2008). Who Answers to Women: Gender and Accountability. doi
  70. (1999). Women and Labor Market Changes in the Global Economy: Growth Helps, Inequalities Hurt and Public Policy Matters. World Development, doi
  71. (1984). Women in the World-System.
  72. (2002). Women’s Activitism and Globalization.
  73. (2005). Women’s discrimination in developing countries: a new data set for better policies. World Development, doi
  74. (1970). Women’s Role in Economic Development. doi
  75. (2009). World development indicators on CD-Rom doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.