Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Varieties of reconciliation

By Jens Meierhenrich

Abstract

In recent years scholars from neighboring disciplines have emphasized the importance of conceptual rigor in designing, administering, and interpreting research in the social sciences. Drawing on this new conceptualism, this article analyzes the much talked about notion of “reconciliation.” In an effort at structuring a useful debate on possible departures from historic injustice, the article formulates a systematized concept of reconciliation based on the multitude of meanings contained in theory and practice. It distinguishes varieties of reconciliation, organizing these varieties into types and subtypes. The article argues that while most varieties of reconciliation emanate from the same root concept, the various outer layers of meaning do not overlap. This hampers not only our understanding of reconciliation, but its promotion in the international system as well. In response to this methodological malaise, the article prescribes friendly amendments—conceptual modifications and refinements designed to increase measurement validation of reconciliation as a conceptual variable

Topics: JX International law, JZ International relations
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell on behalf of the American Bar Foundation
Year: 2008
DOI identifier: 10.1111/j.1747-4469.2008.00098.x
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:29263
Provided by: LSE Research Online
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://www.wiley.com/bw/submit... (external link)
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/29263... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.