Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Geography of a sports metropolis

By Gabriel M. Ahlfeldt and Arne Feddersen

Abstract

This study analyzes the sports infrastructure of Hamburg, Germany, from the residents’ perspective. Empirical evidence is provided using a micro-level dataset of 1,319 sports facilities, which is merged with highly disaggre-gated data on population, socio-demographic characteristics and land values. Based on implicit travel costs, locations’ endowment of sports infrastructure is captured by potentiality variables, while accounting for natural and unnatural barriers. Given potential demand, central areas are found to be relatively un-derprovided with a sports infrastructure compared to peripheral areas where opportunity cost in the form of price of land is lower. The determinants of spatial distribution vary systematically across types of sports facilities. Publicly provided open sports fields and sports halls tend to be concentrated in areas of relatively low income which is in line with their social infrastructure character, emphasized by local authorities. In contrast, there is a clear tendency for market allocated tennis facilities to follow purchasing power. Areas with higher proportions of foreigners are subject to relatively lower provision of a sports infrastructure, which contradicts the stated ambitions of planning authorities

Topics: G Geography (General), H Social Sciences (General)
Publisher: L'Harmattan
Year: 2010
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:29080
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2010). If Alonso was right: Modelling accessibility and explaining the residential land gradient, doi
  2. (2008). Impact of Sports Arenas on Land Values: Evidence from Berlin, doi
  3. (2009). Architecture and the Impact on Location Desirability: The Case of “Olympic Arenas” in BerlinPrenzlauer Berg, doi
  4. 2009b, Is the Whole More Than the Sum of Its Parts: External Effects of Built Environment, Real Estate Economics,
  5. (2009). Stadium Architecture and Urban Development from the Perspective of Urban Economics, doi
  6. (1964). Location and Land Use: Toward a General Theory of Land Rent, doi
  7. (1984). Recreation and Tourism, doi
  8. (1988). An Analysis of the Economic Rationale for Public Subsidization of Sports Stadiums, doi
  9. (1997). The Employment Effect of Teams and Sports Facilities, The Brookings Institute,
  10. (1997). Spatial Dependence and House Price Index Construction,
  11. (1999). The Growth Effects of Sport Franchises, Stadia and Arenas, doi
  12. (2006). Proximity Benefits and Voting on Stadium and Arena Subsidies, doi
  13. (1999). von Hamburg, Gutachterausschuss für Grundstückswerte, doi
  14. (1954). The Market as a Factor in the Localization of Industry in the United States, doi
  15. (2008). Legislative Representation, Bargaining Power and the Distribution of Federal Funds: doi
  16. (1996). The Self-Organizing doi
  17. (1940). The Economics of Location, doi
  18. (2008). Mega-Events: The Effect of the World's Biggest Sporting Events on Local, Regional, and National Economies,
  19. (1969). The Value of Urban Land, doi
  20. (2006). The Economic Impact of Sports Facilities, doi
  21. (2005). How Does a New Sports Stadium Affect Housing Values? The Case of Fedex Field,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.