Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Remedying European legal pluralism: the FIAMM and Fedon litigation and the judicial protection of international trade bystanders

By Marco Dani

Abstract

In FIAMM and Fedon the European Court of Justice has ruled that Community firms hit by US trade sanctions authorized by the WTO Dispute Settlement Body are not entitled to compensation from EC political institutions. The article discusses the cases in the background of current debates on the attitude of the Court of Justice towards international law and, more broadly, on European legal pluralism. From this standpoint, it provides a critical assessment of the legal issues involved in this litigation - internal status of WTO obligations, scope for manoeuvre of EC political institutions in international trade relations, liability for unlawful and lawful conduct - and offers a comparative analysis of its possible solutions, suggesting that a finding of liability for lawful conduct would have been a preferable outcome in both theoretical and substantive terms

Topics: JX International law, JN Political institutions (Europe)
Publisher: Oxford University Press on behalf of European Journal of International Law
Year: 2010
DOI identifier: 10.1093/ejil
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:29017
Provided by: LSE Research Online
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://www.ejil.org/ (external link)
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/29017... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.