Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Power and persuasion in investment treaty interpretation: the dual role of states

By Anthea Roberts

Abstract

A key problem in the investment treaty field is that the balance of interpretive power between treaty parties and tribunals is askew. States entering into investment treaties establish dual roles for themselves as treaty parties (with an interest in interpretation) and actual or potential respondents in investor-state disputes (with an interest in avoiding liability). By viewing states primarily as respondents rather than also as treaty parties, investment tribunals often overlook or undervalue the relevance of the treaty parties' subsequent agreements and practice. This article seeks to redress this imbalance by proposing an interpretive approach that takes better account of such evidenc

Topics: K Law (General)
Publisher: American Society of International Law
Year: 2010
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:28972
Provided by: LSE Research Online
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://www.asil.org/ajil.cfm (external link)
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/28972... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.