Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Is global democracy possible?

By Mathias Koenig-Archibugi


Scepticism about the possibility of a democratically governed global polity is often rooted in beliefs about ‘necessary conditions’. Some democracy scholars consider a transition to global democracy to be incompatible with necessary conditions for democratic governance, while some International Relations scholars consider it to be incompatible with necessary conditions for international structural change. This article assesses hypotheses and evidence about democratic transitions within states and transformations in the interaction among states and concludes that arguments based on necessary conditions are not compelling. This suggests that global democracy may be unlikely but it is not impossible

Topics: JZ International relations, JC Political theory
Publisher: Sage
Year: 2011
DOI identifier: 10.1177/1354066110366056
OAI identifier:
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles


  1. (2004a) ‘Explaining Government Preferences for Institutional Change in EU Foreign and Security Policy’, doi
  2. (2000). A Critique of Held’, doi
  3. (2006). A Democratic Theory of Territory and Some Puzzles about Global Democracy’, doi
  4. (2000). A More Perfect Union? The Liberal Peace and the Challenge of Globalization’, doi
  5. (2008). Aart doi
  6. (2005). Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics’, doi
  7. (2006). Accountability in World Politics’, doi
  8. (2004). Addressing Inequality’, doi
  9. (2006). Agents, Structures and International Relations: Politics as Ontology. Cambridge: doi
  10. (2002). Aggregating Sets of Judgements: An Impossibility Result’, doi
  11. (2009). An Overview of the Asymmetric Bipolar Representation of Positive and Negative Information doi
  12. and Yogendra Yadav (2007) ‘”Nation State” or “State Nation”? India in Comparative Perspective’, doi
  13. (2002). Argument and Change in World Politics: Ethics, Decolonization, and Humanitarian Intervention. Cambridge: doi
  14. (2007). Bounding Power: Republican Security Theory from the Polis to the Global Village. doi
  15. (1988). Britain and Decolonization: The Retreat from Empire in the PostWar World. doi
  16. (2005). Building Europe's Parliament: Democratic Representation Beyond the Nation-state. doi
  17. (1999). Can International Organizations Be Democratic? A Skeptic's View’, doi
  18. (2003). Can the Whole World Become Democratic? Democracy, Development, and International Policies’. Paper 03-05. Irvine: Center for the Study of Democracy,
  19. (1991). Capitalist Development and Democracy. doi
  20. (2000). Citizenship and National Identity. doi
  21. (2005). Comparing Political Regimes.
  22. (2002). Conceivability and Possibility. doi
  23. (2004). Cosmopolitan Democracy and its Critics: A Review’, doi
  24. (2008). Decolonization and Its Impact: A Comparative Approach to the End of the Colonial Empires. doi
  25. (2004). Decolonization. Second edition.
  26. (1995). Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. doi
  27. (1998). Democracy in the United Nations System: Cosmopolitan and Communitarian Principles’,
  28. (2000). Democratic Governance Beyond the Nation-State: The EU and Other International Institutions’, doi
  29. (2007). Democratic Politics in the European Parliament, Cambridge: doi
  30. (2003). Democratization: a Comparative Analysis of 170 Countries. doi
  31. (2001). Determinants of Lasting Democracy doi
  32. (2005). Does Collective Identity Presuppose an Other? On the Alleged Incoherence of Global Solidarity’, doi
  33. (1995). Economic Determinants of Democracy’. doi
  34. eds (2005) Law and Governance in Postnational Europe: Compliance Beyond the Nation-state. Cambridge: doi
  35. (2003). Endogenizing Corporate Identities: The Next Step in Constructivist IR Theory’, doi
  36. (1985). European Decolonization 1918-1981. doi
  37. (1999). Fantasy Theory’, doi
  38. (2004). From International to World Society? English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. Cambridge: doi
  39. (1978). Fuzzy Sets as the Basis for a Theory of Possibility’ Fuzzy Sets and Systems doi
  40. (2003). Global Governance and Democratic Accountability’, in David Held and Mathias Koenig-Archibugi (eds) Taming Globalization: Frontiers of Governance,
  41. (2004). Global Governance, Participation and the Public Sphere’, doi
  42. (2008). Global Stakeholder Democracy. Oxford: doi
  43. (2004). Human Development Report doi
  44. (2001). Is Post-national Democracy Possible?’ doi
  45. (2008). Letting Go Without a Fight: Decolonization, Democracy and War, 1900-94’, doi
  46. (2008). Modeling Positive and Negative Information in Possibility Theory’, doi
  47. (1997). Modernization: Theories and Facts’, doi
  48. (2002). Office of the Registrar General doi
  49. (1996). Philosophical Foundations of the Social Sciences. Cambridge: doi
  50. (2000). Popular Sovereignty or Cosmopolitan Democracy? Liberalism, Kant and International Reform’, doi
  51. (1996). Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: doi
  52. (2003). Problems of Democratizing Global Governance: Time, Space and the Emancipatory Process’, doi
  53. Raffaele (2008a) ‘A Matter of Drawing Boundaries: Global Democracy and International Exclusion’, doi
  54. Raffaele (2008b) Global Democracy: For and Against. London and
  55. (2006). Reducing Complexity in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): Remote and Proximate Factors and the Consolidation of Democracy’, doi
  56. (1986). Reflections on “Theory of International Politics”: A Reply To My Critics’,
  57. (2005). Rethinking the World: Great Power Strategies and International Order. doi
  58. (2001). Revolutions in Sovereignty: How Ideas Shaped Modern International Relations. doi
  59. (1973). Size and Democracy. Stanford: doi
  60. (2006). Size Really Doesn’t Matter: In Search of a National Scale Effect’, doi
  61. (1951). Social Choice and Individual Values. doi
  62. (1999). Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: doi
  63. (1959). Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy’, doi
  64. (2006). Sovereign Inequalities and Hierarchy in Anarchy: American Power and International Society’, doi
  65. (1999). Sovereignty, Survival and the Westphalian Blind Alley in International Relations’, doi
  66. (2005). State Sovereignty, Federation and Kantian Cosmopolitanism’, doi
  67. (2004). Taming the Sovereigns: Institutional Change in International Politics. Cambridge: doi
  68. (1977). The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. doi
  69. (1989). The Domestic Analogy and World Order Proposals. Cambridge: doi
  70. (1993). The Emerging Structure of doi
  71. (1991). The End of the British Empire: The Historical Debate. doi
  72. (2008). The Global Commonwealth of Citizens: Toward Cosmopolitan Democracy. doi
  73. (2004). The Political Unification of the World: Whether, When, doi
  74. (2000). The Spiral of Capitalism and Socialism: Toward Global Democracy. doi
  75. (2003). The Substantive Importance of Necessary Condition Hypotheses’
  76. (2001). The Success of India's Democracy. Cambridge: doi
  77. (1998). The Transformation of Political Community. doi
  78. (1998). The Untouchables: Subordination, Poverty and the State in Modern India. Cambridge: doi
  79. (1993). The Weight of Ideas in Decolonization: Normative Change
  80. (1979). Theory of International Politics. doi
  81. (2002). Transnational Democracy: Theories and Prospects’,
  82. (1999). Unarmed Forces: The Transnational Movement to End the Cold War. doi
  83. (1994). Understanding Change doi
  84. (1981). War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: doi
  85. (2003). Why a World State is Inevitable’, doi
  86. (2005). Worlds Apart: Measuring International and Global Inequality. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.