Abstract. Public Choice relies heavily on equilibrium analysis in its models of government failure. Austrians are suspicious of equilibrium analysis owing to its reliance on some variant of the perfect-knowledge assumption. To what extent then can Austrians consistently embrace public-choice descriptions of government failure? This paper argues that to maintain methodological consistency Public Choice should jettison the equilibrium, perfectinformation framework, while keeping the empirically relevant assumption of narrow political interest. Key Words: Austrian political economy, public choice, radical ignoranc
To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.