Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Mineral resource abundance and violent political conflict: a critical assessment of the rentier state model

By Jonathan DiJohn

Abstract

In this paper, Jonathan Di John critically examines the so-called 'rentier state' argument, the idea that abundance of natural resources causes poor growth, and raises the incidence, intensity and duration of conflict. The basic premise of the rentier state model is that rentier state leaders, by relying on 'unearned' income (in the form of mineral rents and/or aid), do not develop a set of reciprocal obligations with citizens via the nexus of domestic taxation. The model also posits that the more leaders can finance state activities through 'unearned' income, the more likely predatory behaviour, including violence, will follow. The author argues that mineral resource abundance does not determine politics in a systematic fashion and finds the empirical evidence that political violence is greater in mineral abundant poor economies unconvincing. The paper concludes with a brief discussion the policy implications of bringing politics back into the causes of war in less developed countries

Topics: HC Economic History and Conditions, JC Political theory, HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology
Publisher: Crisis States Research Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science
Year: 2002
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:28271
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1995). A Propensity to Self-Subversion, doi
  2. (1965). Democracy and Development’,
  3. (2000). Greed and Grievance: Economic Agendas in doi
  4. (1972). Political Economy of Resource-Abundant States’,
  5. (2000). Rienner, 2002a De Soysa, ‘Paradise is a Bazaar? Greed, Creed, and Governance in Civil War, 1989-1999’, Journal of Peace Research, 39:4 (2002b) De Waal, A., Who Fights? Who Cares? War and Humanitarian Action in Africa,
  6. (1981). Social Conflicts as Pillars of Democratic Market Societies’, doi
  7. (1990). Survival of an imperfect democracy in the Philippines’, Democratization, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.