Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

2004) “Is it better to be a boy? A disaggregated outlay equivalent analysis of gender bias in Papua New Guinea

By John Gibson and Scott Rozelle

Abstract

Discrimination in the allocation of goods between boys and girls within households in Papua New Guinea is examined using Deaton’s (1989) outlay-equivalent ratio method. Adding a boy to the household reduces expenditure on adult goods by as much as would a nine-tenths reduction in total outlay per member, but girls have no effect on adult goods expenditure. The hypothesis of Haddad and Reardon (1993) that gender bias is inversely related to the importance of female labour in agricultural production is not supported. There is no evidence of bias against girls in the urban sector

Topics: JEL, D12, J16 Keywords, Boy-girl discrimination, Gender bias, Outlay-equivalent analysis 1
Year: 2011
OAI identifier: oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.195.7588
Provided by: CiteSeerX
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/v... (external link)
  • http://www.agecon.ucdavis.edu/... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.