ABSTRACT: We show experimentally that whether and how communication achieves beneficial social outcomes in a hidden-information context depends crucially on whether low-talent agents can participate in a Pareto-improving outcome. Communication is effective (and patterns of lies & truth quite systematic) when this is feasible, but otherwise completely ineffective. We examine the data in the light of two potentially relevant behavioral models: cost-of-lying and guilt-from-blame
To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.