Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Proportionality, balancing, and the cult of constitutional rights scholarship

By Grégoire C. N. Webber

Abstract

Constitutional rights’ scholarship is anchored in the cult of proportionality and balancing. Despite the absence of reference to proportionality or balancing in most State constitutions or international conventions, scholars and judges alike have embraced a vocabulary of proportion, cost, weight, and balance. Drawing on the work of German scholar Robert Alexy and Canadian scholar David Beatty, this essay attempts to illustrate how the principle of proportionality conceals more than it reveals in rights-reasoning. By challenging the contemporary cult of practical reasoning over rights, the essay advocates a turn away from a methodology and vocabulary of proportionality in favour of a more direct struggle with political-moral reasoning

Topics: K Law (General)
Publisher: University of Western Ontario
Year: 2010
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:27634
Provided by: LSE Research Online
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://www.law.uwo.ca/research... (external link)
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/27634... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.