Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Thorax Online First, published on January 13, 2011 as 10.1136/thx.2010.155481 PostScript LETTER

By Edson Marchiori, Klaus L Irion, Gláucia Zanetti and Bruno Hochhegger


Atoll sign or reversed halo sign? Which term should be used? We read with great interest the article by Walsh and Robertson 1 reporting a case of cryptogenic organising pneumonia. The authors included wonderful images of a CT pattern they called the ‘atoll sign’, which has been described by other authors as the ‘reversed halo sign’. Zompatori et al 2 first used the term ‘atoll sign ’ in 1999 to describe the imaging finding of a focal rounded area of ground-glass opacity surrounded by a more or less complete ring of consolidation. 3 Although the abnormality frequently resembles an atoll, the Fleischner Society 4 prefers the term ‘reversed halo sign’, as initially proposed by Kim et al. 3 Although both terms adequately describe the imaging characteristics of the lesion, the term ‘reversed halo sign ’ should be used to avoid confusion and to standardise the keywords used in literature searches. A review of the US National Institutes of Health digital archive of biomedical and life sciences journal literature (PubMed) found only three occurrences of the term ‘atoll sign’, whereas the term ‘reversed halo sign’ was found in 22 articles. The uniform use of descriptors is critical when reporting on lesions, to avoid the overlooking of otherwise important articles, such as the one presented by Walsh and Robertson, in literature reviews

Year: 2011
OAI identifier: oai:CiteSeerX.psu:
Provided by: CiteSeerX
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • (external link)
  • (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.