Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute,

By Elisa H. Barney Smith, Daniel Lopresti and George Nagy

Abstract

Optical mark sensing, i.e., detecting whether a “bubble ” has been filled in, may seem straightforward. However, on US election ballots the shape, intensity, size and position of the marks, while specified, are highly variable due to a diverse electorate. The ballots may be produced and scanned by poorly maintained equipment. Yet near-perfect results are required. To improve the current technology, which has been subject to criticism, components of a process for identifying marks on an optical sense ballot are evaluated. When marked synthetic ballots are compared to an unmarked ballot, the absolute difference of adaptive thresholded images gives best detection rates for all darknesses of marks, but at a false alarm rate increase. Simple absolute differencing can give good detection results with lower false alarm rates. 1

Year: 2010
OAI identifier: oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.160.8381
Provided by: CiteSeerX
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/v... (external link)
  • http://www.ecse.rpi.edu/homepa... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.