Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Better RED than dead: paying the people for environmental services in Amazonia

By Anthony Hall

Abstract

The introduction of payments for environmental services (PES) offers an opportunity for traditional and indigenous populations to be compensated for contributing to carbon sequestration in meeting the challenge of ameliorating global warming. As one mechanism among several for promoting biodiversity conservation and sustainable development, pro-poor PES initiatives could eventually be incorporated into an international post-Koyoto framework to encourage reduced emissions from deforestation. Brazil's Proambiente PES scheme for small farmers in Amazonia has enjoyed some limited success, but it has fallen short of expectations. Its performance has been undermined by the lack of a national legal framework, limited funding, reduced implementation capacity, poor cross-sector collaboration and incompatibility with existing regional development policies. These challenges are being addressed by the federal government in cooperation with civil society with a view to scaling up Proambiente into a national programme

Topics: GE Environmental Sciences, H Social Sciences (General)
Publisher: The Royal Society
Year: 2008
DOI identifier: 10.1098/rstb.2007.0034
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:21241
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2000). Amazonia at the crossroads: the challenge of sustainable development, doi
  2. (2006). Bases Conceituais para uma Polı ´tica de Servic ¸os Ambientais para o Desenvolvimento. Brasilia, Brazil: Ministry of the Environment, Grupo de Trabalho, Polı ´tica Nacional de Pagamentos por Servic ¸os Ambientais.
  3. (1992). Brazil: an analysis of environmental problems in the Amazon. Washington DC: World Bank.
  4. (2007). Cientistas rejeitam pagamento por preservac ¸a ˜o. Estado de Sa ˜o Paulo,
  5. (2007). Coalition for rainforest nations.
  6. (2007). Comunidades ribeirinhas do norte do Amazonas comec ¸am a receber o Bolsa Floresta.
  7. (2000). Deforestation impacts, environmental services and the international community. In Amazonia at the crossroads: the challenge of sustainable development
  8. (1989). Developing Amazonia: deforestation and social conflict in Brazil’s Caraja ´s programme. doi
  9. (2004). Diagno ´stico da Implantac ¸a ˜o do Proambiente. Brasilia, Brazil: Ministry of the Environment.
  10. (2006). Eating up the Amazon.
  11. (2008). Ecological economic and climatic tipping points of an Amazon forest dieback.
  12. (2008). Effects of large-scale Amazon forest degradation on climate and air quality through fluxes of carbon dioxide, water, energy, mineral dust and isoprene. doi
  13. (2001). Environmentalists split over Kyoto and Amazonian deforestation. doi
  14. (2006). Execuc ¸a ˜od o Ministe ´rio do
  15. (2006). Fiscalizac ¸a ˜o aumenta presenc ¸a na Amazo ˆnia, mas impunidade para os crimes ambientais continua, 12 November. See http://www.socioambiental.org/nsa/detalhe?idZ2369.
  16. (1978). Frontier expansion in Amazonia. Gainseville, FL: doi
  17. (2007). Fundamentos Econo ˆmicos da Proposta de Pacto Nacional pelo Desmatamento Zero na Floresta Amazo ˆnica.B e n s e n v i l l e ,I L :
  18. (2008). Generating carbon finance through avoided deforestation and its potential to create climatic, conservation, and human development benefits. doi
  19. (1988). Government policies and deforestation in Brazil’s Amazon region. doi
  20. (2005). How can market mechanisms for forest environmental services help the poor? Preliminary lessons from Latin America. doi
  21. (2006). Incentivo para a preservac ¸a ˜o amplia impacto regional. Valor Econo ˆmico,
  22. (2003). Local sustainable effects of carbon projects in Brazil and Bolivia: a view from the field. Paper presented at the Int. Conf. on Rural Livelihoods, Forests and Biodiversity,
  23. (1997). Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. doi
  24. (1931). Payments for environmental services A. Hall
  25. (2005). Payments for environmental services: some nuts and bolts.
  26. (2005). Pecua ´ria na Amazo ˆnia: tende ˆncias e implicac ¸o ˜es para a conservac ¸a ˜o. Bele ´m,
  27. (2007). Polı ´tica Nacional de Ater: Assiste ˆncia Te ´cnica e Extensa ˜o Rural. Brasilia, Brazil: Ministry of Agrarian Development.
  28. (2005). Refere ˆncias para uma Estrate ´gia de Desenvolvimento Rural Sustenta ´vel no Brasil. Brasilia, Brazil: Ministry of Agrarian Development.
  29. (2007). Seeing ‘RED’? ‘Avoided deforestation’ and the rights of indigenous peoples and local communities.
  30. (2007). Soy Moratorium turns one.
  31. (1997). Sustaining Amazonia: grassroots action for productive conservation. doi
  32. (2006). The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation. doi
  33. (1989). The fate of the forest: developers, destroyers and defenders of the Amazon. doi
  34. (1985). The last frontier: fighting over land in the Amazon.
  35. (2005). Tropical deforestation and the Kyoto Protocol. doi
  36. (2007). Uma reforma agra ´ria destruidora—e inu ´til. Sa ˜o Paulo,
  37. (2006). Voluntary carbon markets. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.