michael,scott£ Most multiprocessors are multiprogrammed to achieve acceptable response time and to increase their utilization. Un-fortunately, inopportune preemption may significantly degrade the performance of synchronized parallel applications. To address this problem, researchers have developed two principal strategies for concurrent, atomic update of shared data structures: (1) preemption-safe locking and (2) non-blocking (lock-free) algorithms. Preemption-safe locking requires kernel support. Non-blocking algorithms generally require a universal atomic primitive such ascompare-and-swap orload-linked/store-conditional, and are widely regarded as inefficient. We evaluate the performance of preemption-safe lock-based and non-blocking implementations of important data structures—queues, stacks, heaps, and counters—including non-blocking and lock-based queue algorithms of our own, in micro-benchmarks and real applications on a 12-processor SGI Challenge multiprocessor. Our results indicate that our non-blocking queue consistently outperforms the best known alternatives, and that data-structure-specific non-blocking algorithms, which exist for queues, stacks, and counters, can work extremely well. Not only do they outperform preemption-safe lock-based algorithms on multiprogrammed machines, they also outperform ordinary locks on dedicated machines. At the same time, since general-purpose non-blocking techniques do not yet appea
To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.