The geometry of the dot and cross product
We argue for pedagogical reasons that the dot and cross products should be defined by their geometric properties, from which algebraic representations can be derived, rather than the other way around.
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/v... (external link)
http://www.physics.orst.edu/br... (external link)